:
1 I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea: 2 That ye receive her in the Lord, as becometh saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever business she hath need of you: for she hath been a succourer of many, and of myself also. 3 Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus: 4 Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. 5 Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ. 6 Greet Mary, who bestowed much labour on us. 7 Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me. 8 Greet Amplias my beloved in the Lord. 9 Salute Urbane, our helper in Christ, and Stachys my beloved. 10 Salute Apelles approved in Christ. Salute them which are of Aristobulus' household. 11 Salute Herodion my kinsman. Greet them that be of the household of Narcissus, which are in the Lord. 12 Salute Tryphena and Tryphosa, who labour in the Lord. Salute the beloved Persis, which laboured much in the Lord. 13 Salute Rufus chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine. 14 Salute Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermas, Patrobas, Hermes, and the brethren which are with them. 15 Salute Philologus, and Julia, Nereus, and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints which are with them. 16 Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you. 17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. 18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. 19 For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil. 20 And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen. 21 Timotheus my workfellow, and Lucius, and Jason, and Sosipater, my kinsmen, salute you. 22 I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, salute you in the Lord. 23 Gaius mine host, and of the whole church, saluteth you. Erastus the chamberlain of the city saluteth you, and Quartus a brother. 24 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen. 25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, 26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: 27 To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen.
[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 9:22-23:24
What he means is somewhat as follows. Pharaoh was a vessel of wrath, that is, a man who by his own hard-heartedness had kindled the wrath of God. For after enjoying much long-suffering, he became no better, but remained unimproved. Wherefore he calls him not only "a vessel of wrath," but also one "fitted for destruction." That is, fully fitted indeed, but by his own proper self. For neither had God left out anything of the things likely to recover him, nor did he leave out anything of those that would ruin him, and put him beyond any forgiveness. Yet still, though God knew this, "He endured him with much long-suffering," being willing to bring him to repentance. For had He not willed this, then He would not have been thus long-suffering. But as he would not use the long-suffering in order to repentance, but fully fitted himself for wrath, He used him for the correction of others, through the punishment inflicted upon him making them better, and in this way setting forth His power. For that it is not God's wish that His power be so made known, but in another way, by His benefits, namely, and kindnesses, he had shown above in all possible ways. For if Paul does not wish to appear powerful in this way ("not that we should appear approved," he says, "but that you should do that which is honest,") [2 Corinthians 13:7], much less does God. But after that he had shown long-suffering, that He might lead to repentance, but he did not repent, He suffered him a long time, that He might display at once His goodness and His power, even if that man were not minded to gain anything from this great long-suffering. As then by punishing this man, who continued incorrigible, He showed His power, so by having pitied those who had done many sins but repented, He manifested His love toward man. But it does not say, love towards man, but glory, to show that this is especially God's glory, and for this He was above all things earnest. But in saying, "which He had afore prepared unto glory," he does not mean that all is God's doing. Since if this were so, there were nothing to hinder all men from being saved. But he is setting forth again His foreknowledge, and doing away with the difference between the Jews and the Gentiles. And on this topic again he grounds a defense of his statement, which is no small one. For it was not in the case of the Jews only that some men perished, and some were saved, but with the Gentiles also this was the case. Wherefore he does not say, all the Gentiles, but, "of the Gentiles," nor, all the Jews, but, "of the Jews." As then Pharaoh became a vessel of wrath by his own lawlessness, so did these become vessels of mercy by their own readiness to obey. For though the more part is of God, still they also have contributed themselves some little. Whence he does not say either, vessels of well-doing, or vessels of boldness (παρρησίας), but "vessels of mercy," to show that the whole is of God. For the phrase, "it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs," even if it comes in the course of the objection, still, were it said by Paul, would create no difficulty. Because when he says, "it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs," he does not deprive us of free-will, but shows that all is not one's own, for that it requires grace from above. For it is binding on us to will, and also to run: but to confide not in our own labors, but in the love of God toward man. And this he has expressed elsewhere. "Yet not I, but the grace which was with me." [1 Corinthians 15:10] And he well says, "Which He had afore prepared unto glory." For since they reproached them with this, that they were saved by grace, and thought to make them ashamed, he far more than sets aside this insinuation. For if the thing brought glory even to God, much more to them through whom God was glorified. But observe his forbearance, and unspeakable wisdom. For when he had it in his power to adduce, as an instance of those punished, not Pharaoh, but such of the Jews as had sinned, and so make his discourse much clearer, and show that where there were the same fathers, and the same sins, some perished, and some had mercy shown them, and persuade them not to be doubtful-minded, even if some of the Gentiles were saved, while the Jews were perishing; that he might not make his discourse irksome, the showing forth of the punishment he draws from the foreigner, so that he may not be forced to call them "vessels of wrath." But those that obtained mercy he draws from the people of the Jews. And besides, he also has spoken in a sufficient way in God's behalf, because though He knew very well that the nation was fitting itself as a vessel of destruction, still He contributed all on His part, His patience, His long-suffering, and that not merely long-suffering, but "much long-suffering;" yet still he was not minded to state it barely against the Jews. Whence then are some vessels of wrath, and some of mercy? Of their own free choice. God, however, being very good, shows the same kindness to both. For it was not those in a state of salvation only to whom He showed mercy, but also Pharaoh, as far as His part went. For of the same long-suffering, both they and he had the advantage. And if he was not saved, it was quite owing to his own will: since, as for what concerns God, he had as much done for him as they who were saved. Having then given to the question that answer which was furnished by facts, in order to give his discourse the advantage of other testimony in its favor, he introduces the prophets also making the same declarations aforetime. For Hosea, he says, of old put this in writing, as follows:

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:1
This passage teaches that there were women ordained in the church’s ministry by the apostle’s authority.… Not only that—they ought to be ordained into the ministry, because they helped in many ways and by their good services deserved the praise even of the apostle.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:1-16
I think there are many, even some apparently good commentators, who hurry over this part of the epistle because they think it is superfluous and of little importance. They probably think much the same about the genealogies in the Gospels. Because it is a catalog of names, they think they can get nothing good out of it. People who mine gold are careful even about the smallest fragments, but these commentators ignore even huge bars of gold!

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:1
See how many ways he takes to give her dignity. For he has both mentioned her before all the rest, and called her sister. And it is no slight thing to be called the sister of Paul. Moreover he has added her rank, by mentioning her being "deaconess."

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:1
Note how many ways Paul dignifies Phoebe. He mentions her before all the rest and even calls her his sister. It is no small thing to be called the sister of Paul! Moreover, he has mentioned her rank of deaconess as well.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:1
Although the text of the letter is already finished, as it were, Paul has attached this material for the purpose of commendation and greeting, as was his custom.Even today, women deaconesses in the East are known to minister to their own sex in baptism or even in the ministry of the Word, for we find that women taught privately, e.g., Priscilla, whose husband was called Aquila.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:1
Cenchreae is a village outside Corinth. It is interesting to note how quickly the gospel was spreading, in that it had already reached the villages. In fact the church at Cenchreae was so large that it even had a woman deaconess, and one who was famous and well known to boot.

[AD 1274] Thomas Aquinas on Romans 16:1
1193. After mentioning certain personal matters about himself to the Romans to whom he was writing, the Apostle now presents certain personal matters pertaining to others. In regard to this he does three things: first, he suggests what they should do for others; secondly, he tells what other do to them [v. 23; n. 1221]; thirdly, he ends the epistle with thanksgiving [v. 25; n. 1223]. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he indicates whom they should welcome; secondly, he shows whom they should avoid [v. 17; n. 1213]. In regard to the first he requests that certain persons in particular be welcomed; secondly, he points out in a general way how to greet them [v. 16; n. 1211]; thirdly, he greets them on the part of the faithful [v. 21; n. 1212]. 1194. In regard to the first he mentions a certain Corinthian woman who went to Rome. He recommends her to them, describing her, first of all, by name, saying: I 596 commend to you Phoebe, who although devoted to God, did not have sufficient influence not to need letters of recommendation, as he once said of himself: "Do we need, as some do, letters of recommendation?" (2 Cor 3:1). Secondly, he describes her religion and faith, saying our sister. For all the women believers were called sisters and all the men brothers: "You are all brothers" (Mt 23:8). Thirdly, from her pious activity, when he says: who is in the ministry of the church at Cenchreae, a port city of the Corinthians, where some Christians were gathered whom this woman had served, just as it was said of Christ Himself (Lk 8:3) that certain women provided for Him out of their means. And about the widow to be enrolled I Tim (5:10) says: "If she has shown hospitality and has washed the feet of the saints." 1195. Then he mentions two things he wants done for her, the first of which is that she be honorable received. And this is what he says: that you may receive her in the Lord, i.e., for the love of God, as befits the saints, for it says in Mt (10:41): "He who receives a righteous man because he is a righteous man shall receive a righteous man’s reward." Instead of as befits the saints [digne sanctis], some books have "worthily enough" [digne satis], i.e., fittingly; but those texts do not agree with the Greek. The second is that they be solicitous in helping her; hence he adds: and help her, namely, by affording advice and aid in any enterprise she may need you. For she possibly had something to settle in Caesar’s curia. 597 1196. But something in I Th (4:11) seems to be opposed to this recommendation, for it says: "Take care of your own business." As if to say: do not get involved in other people’s affairs. The answer is that one can help in another’s affairs in the ways: first, in a worldly way, i.e., for the favor of men or for gain; and this does not befit God’s servants. "No soldier of God gets entangled in civilian pursuits" (2 Tim 2:4). In another way someone may help in another’s affairs out of piety; for example, to help the needy and the wretched, and this is religious according to Jas (1:27): Religion pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself unstained from this world." It is in this way that the Apostle speaks here. 1197. Finally, the Apostle tells why this is owed to her, saying: She has been a help of many of myself as well: "Tell the righteous that it shall be well with them, for they shall eat the fruit of their deeds" (Is 3:10); "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy" (Mt 5:7). 1198. Then he recommends other persons connected with him to be greeted, saying: Greet Prisca and Aquila, who was her husband, but he mentions her first, perhaps because of the greater devotion of her faith, my fellow workers in Christ, i.e., in preaching the faith of Christ. For he stayed with them in Corinth, as is found in Acts (18:1-3). 1199. Who risked their necks for my life, i.e., put themselves in danger of death to save my life, an indication of the greatest charity: "Greater love has no man than that he lay down his life for his friends" (Jn 15:13). 598 This seems to have happened at Corinth where Paul suffered persecution, as is found in Acts (18:6). Or perhaps it is better to say that others exposed themselves to danger for the Apostle. For what is read in Acts (18:21) occurred when Prisca and Aquila left Rome for Corinth. But the Apostle wrote this, when he thought they were still at Rome. Now the Apostle’s life was necessary not so much for himself as for others, as he says in Phil (1:24): "But to remain in the flesh is more necessary on our account." Therefore he continues: to whom not only I give thanks but also all the Church of the Gentiles, whose apostle and teacher I am: "A teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth" (I Tim 2:7); greet also the church in their house. For they had many believers assembled in their house. 1200. Then he wants another person joined to him by love to be greeted, saying: Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who was the first convert in Asia for Christ. This lent him great dignity: "You have come to the assembly of the firstborn, who are enrolled in heaven" (Heb 12:23). But at that time he was in Rome. 1201. Then he says: Greet Mary, who has worked hard among you to restore concord among them, and when she failed in her endeavor, she notified the Apostle: "The fruit of good labors is renowned." (Wis 3:15). Then he says, Greet Andronicus and Junias, whom he describes, first, from their race when he says: my kinsmen. This shows that they were Jews, about whom he said above (9:3): "They are my kinsmen by race." Secondly, from the suffering they endured for Christ, saying" and my fellow prisoners. For they had been in prison once with the Apostle: "with far more imprisonments" (2Cor 11:23). Thirdly, from their authority when he says: they are men of note among the 599 apostles, i.e., noble among the preachers. Fourthly, from the time, when he says: and they were in Christ before me. For they had been converted before the Apostle and thus were owed greater respect: "Do not rebuke an older man, but exhort him as you would a father" (I Tim 5:1). 1203. Then he says, Greet Ampliatus, my beloved in the Lord, beloved in the love of charity, which is in Christ: "God is my witness, how I yearn for you all with the affection of Christ Jesus" (Phil 1:8). 1204. Then he says, Greet Urbanas, our fellow worker in Christ, i.e., in preaching the faith: "A brother helped is like a strong city" (Pr 18:19), and my beloved Stachys. He mentions them together, perhaps because they lived together or were connected in some other way. 1205. Then he says, Greet Apelles, who is approved in Christ, perhaps through certain tribulations: "When he has tried me, I shall come forth as gold" (Jb 23:10). 1206. Then he says, Greet all who of the house, i.e., of the family, of Aristobulus, in whose house many believers were gathered whom he does not greet, perhaps because they were absent for some reason. Then he says, Greet my kinsman Herodion, who from the designation is said to be Jewish. Then he says, Greet all who belong to the family of Narcissus, who is said to have been a presbyter and wandered through desert places to comfort the faithful. Hence the Apostle, knowing that he was away, did not ask that he be greeted but his family. Yet there were some unbelievers in this family, and therefore to note the difference, he says: who are in the Lord, because he was asking only believers to be 600 greeted: "If anyone comes to you and does not bring the doctrine, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting" (2 Jn v. 10). 1207. Then he says, Greet Tryphaena and Tryphosa, who have labored in the Lord, i.e., in ministering to the saints, which the Lord regards as done to Himself, as it says in Mt (25:40): "As you did it to one of these, the least of my brethren, you did it to me." Then he says, Greet the beloved Persis, whom the Apostle especially loved for his devotion. Hence he adds: who has worked hard in the Lord, i.e., by exhorting others and ministering to the saints, and even in poverty and other spiritual works: "In toil and hardship, in hunger and thirst" (2 Cor 11:27). 1208. Then he says, Greet Rufus, elect in the Lord, i.e., in the grace of Christ: "He chose us in him before the foundation of the world" (Eph 1:4); also his mother, according to the flesh, and mine, because she was his mother as a benefactor. For she had served the Apostle at one time, although she was not in Rome: "Older women like mothers, younger women like sisters, in all purity" (I Tim 5:2). 1209. Then he says, Greet Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermes, Patrobas, Hermas and all the brethren who are with them. He greets them together, because they lived together in harmony: "God gives the lonely a home to live in" (Ps 68:6). 1210. Then he says, Greet Philologus, Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas and all the saints who are with them, i.e., sanctified in the faith of Christ: "You were washed, you were sanctified" (I Cor 6:11). 1211. Then he shows them in general how to greet others, saying: Greet one another with a holy kiss, which he says to distinguish it from a sensual kiss, about which 601 Pr (7:13) says: "She seizes him and kisses him"; and to distinguish it from a deceitful kiss, about which Pr (27:6) says: "Better are wounds from a friend than the fraudulent kisses of an enemy." The holy kiss is given as a sign of the Blessed Trinity: "O that he would kiss me with the kiss of his mouth" (Song 1:2). From this the custom arose in the Church whereby the faithful give one another the kiss of peace during the solemnities of the Mass. 1212. Then he greets them on behalf of the other churches, saying: all the churches of Christ greet you, i.e., those assembled in the name and faith of Christ, because all wish your salvation and pray for you: "Pray for one another, that you may be saved" (Jas 5:16).
[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:2
Paul commands that those who dedicate themselves to good works ought to be received by their brethren and be held in honor by being provided with whatever they might need.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:2
Paul praises Phoebe as highly as he does because the more she appears to be an excellent person in the sight of others, the more she will receive the help owed to her in love.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:2
To the excellence of these St. Luke also bears witness. Partly when he says that Paul "abode with them, for by their occupation they were tent-makers" [Acts 18:3]; and partly when he points out the woman as receiving Apollos, and instructing him in the way of the Lord. [Acts 18:26] Now these are great things, but what Paul mentions are greater. And what does he mention? In the first place he calls them "helpers," to point out that they had been sharers of his very great labors and dangers. Then he says,

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:2
There are two reasons why Phoebe should be received by them. First, she has been received by the Lord, and second, she is herself a saint.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:2
Help her with expenses or support, says Paul, because she also helped many people as long as she had the means.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:2
It is probable that Phoebe helped Paul by offering him hospitality in her house at Corinth for the short time that he was there. In return Paul opened the whole world to her, and throughout the Mediterranean she became a famous woman.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:3
These were Jews who, after they believed, became coworkers with the apostle because they had believed correctly and were thus able to persuade others to accept the right faith. Apollos, for example, although he was learned in the Scriptures, was nevertheless taught the way of the Lord more correctly by them. This is why Paul calls them his fellow workers “in Christ Jesus.”

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:3
Luke also bears witness to them when he says that Paul dwelt with them and that Priscilla [Prisca] had received Apollos and instructed him in the way of the Lord.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:3
They are said to have established Apollos in the faith. Paul calls them helpers because they helped him in his work of instruction.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:3
Paul adds “in Christ Jesus” to show that Prisca (or Priscilla; both forms are found in the manuscripts) and Aquila were not merely Paul’s hosts but that they were fellow evangelists as well.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:4
This shows that Priscilla and Aquila were hospitable to Gentiles as well as to Jews. Hospitality is highly esteemed both by God and by man.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:4
You see they are thoroughly furnished martyrs. For in Nero's time it is probable that there were thousands of dangers, at the time as he even commanded all Jews to be removed from Rome. [Acts 8:2].

"Unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the Churches of the Gentiles."

Here he hints at their hospitality, and pecuniary assistance, holding them in admiration because they had both poured forth their blood, and had made their whole property open to all. You see these were noble women, hindered no way by their sex in the course of virtue. And this is as might be expected. "For in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female." [Galatians 3:28] And what he had said of the former, that he said also of this. For of her also he had said, "she has been a succorer of many, and of myself also." So too of this woman "not only I give thanks, but also all the Churches of the Gentiles." Now that in this he might not seem to be a flatterer, he also adduces a good many more witnesses to these women.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:4
Here Paul hints at their hospitality and financial assistance, holding them in admiration because they had both poured forth their blood and had made their whole property available to everybody. Notice how noble were the women Paul named. They were in no way hindered by their sex from following the path of virtue, and this is only to be expected. “For in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female.”

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:4
By supporting Paul’s teaching, they exposed themselves to danger. Therefore all the churches thank them, for Paul was kept from harm by them.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:5
Paul mentions Epaenetus’s claim to fame, in order to show that important people believe and turn to the faith and in order to invite the leaders of the Romans to accept Christ, and if they have already done so, to become humble.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:5
"Salute my well-beloved Epenetus, who is the first-fruits of Achaia unto Christ."

I think that many even of those who have the appearance of being extremely good men, hasten over this part of the Epistle as superfluous, and having no great weight in it. And I think that the same befalls them in regard to the genealogy that is in the Gospel. For because it is a catalogue of names, they think they cannot get any great good from it. Yet the gold founders' people are careful even about the little fragments; while these pass over even such great cakes of gold. That this then may not befall them, what I have already said were enough to lead them off from their listlessness. For that the gain even from this is no contemptible one, we have shown even from what was said on a former occasion, when we lifted up your soul by means of these addresses. We will endeavor then today also to mine in this same place. For it is possible even from bare names to find a great treasure. If, for instance, you were shown why Abraham was so called, why Sarah, why Israel, why Samuel, you would find even from this a great many real subjects of research. And from times too, and from places, you may gather the same advantage. For the good man waxes rich even from these; but he that is slothful, does not gain even from the most evident things. Thus the very name of Adam teaches us no small wisdom, and that of his son, and of his wife, and most of the others. For names serve to remind us of several circumstances. They show at once God's benefits and women's thankfulness. For when they conceived by the gift of God, it was they who gave these names to the children. But why are we now philosophizing about names, while meanings so important are neglected, and many do not so much as know the very names of the sacred books? Still even then we ought not to recede from an attention to things of this sort. For "you ought," He says, "to have put My money to the exchangers." [Matthew 25:27] And therefore though there be nobody that listens to it, let us do our part, and show that there is nothing superfluous, nothing added at random in the Scriptures. For if these names had no use, they would not then have been added to the Epistle, nor would Paul have written what he has written. But there are some even so low-minded, and empty, and unworthy of Heaven, as not to think that names only, but whole books of the Bible are of no use, as Leviticus, Joshua, and more besides. And in this way many of the simple ones have been for rejecting the Old Testament, and advancing on in the way, that results from this evil habit of mind, have likewise pruned away many parts of the New Testament also. But of these men, as intoxicated and living to the flesh, we do not make much account. But if any be a lover of wisdom, and a friend to spiritual entertainments, let him be told that even the things which seem to be unimportant in Scripture, are not placed there at random and to no purpose, and that even the old laws have much to profit us. For it says, "All these things are types (A.V. ensamples) and are written for our instruction." [1 Corinthians 10:11] Wherefore to Timothy too he says, "Give heed to reading, to exhortation" [1 Timothy 4:13], so urging him to the reading of the old books, though he was a man with so great a spirit in him, as to be able to drive out devils, and to raise the dead. Let us now keep on with the subject in hand. "Salute my well-beloved Epenetus." It is worth learning from this how he distributes to each the different praises. For this praise is no slight one, but even very great, and a proof of great excellence in him, that Paul should hold him beloved, Paul who had no idea of loving by favor, and not by cool judgment. Then another encomium comes, "Who is the first-fruits of Achaia." For what he means is, either that he leaped forward before any one else, and became a believer (and this were no slight praise), or that he displayed more religious behavior than any other. And on this account after saying, "who is the first-fruits of Achaia," he does not hold his peace, but to prevent your suspecting it to be a glory of the world's, he added, "unto Christ." Now if in civil matters, he that is first seems to be great and honorable, much more so in these. As then it was likely that they were of low extraction, he speaks of the true noble birth and preëminency, and gives him his honors from this. And he says, that he "is the first-fruits," not of Corinth only, but of the whole nation, as having become as it were a door, and an entrance to the rest. And to such, the reward is no small one. For such an one will reap much recompense also from the achievements of others, in that he too contributed much toward them by beginning.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:5
Priscilla was noble enough to make their house a church, both by converting everyone in it and by opening it to strangers. Paul did not normally call houses churches, except when there was much godliness in them.… For even married people may become worthy of esteem and noble. These were married and became very honorable, even though their profession was that of tentmaker, which is far from honorable in itself.Note how Paul calls Epaenetus “beloved,” which is high praise indeed. For Paul did not use a word like this to show favoritism; rather, it was the result of calm, cool reflection. Moreover, he was the first convert in Achaea, either in time or in quality.… Given that it was likely that all these people were of humble birth, Paul shows what true nobility is and honors them accordingly.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:5
Paul shows that a gathering of believers is called a “church.” Epaenetus was the firstborn of the church in Asia Minor. We learn from their names that all the people Paul greets were foreigners, and it is not unreasonable to suppose that the Romans came to faith through their example and teaching.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:5
Evidently Prisca and Aquila had preached the gospel to their servants and converted them to the Lord. St. Luke mentions them [in Acts 18:24-28] and shows how they led Apollos to the truth.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:6
Paul is teaching here that women too ought to work for the churches of God. They work when they teach children how to behave, when they love their husbands, when they feed their children, when they are modest and chaste, when they keep a good household, when they are kind, when they are submissive to their husbands, when they exercise hospitality, when they wash the feet of the saints, and when they do all the other things which are allotted to women in the Bible.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:6
How is this? A woman again is honored and proclaimed victorious! Again are we men put to shame. Or rather, we are not put to shame only, but have even an honor conferred upon us. For an honor we have, in that there are such women among us, but we are put to shame, in that we men are left so far behind by them. But if we come to know whence it comes, that they are so adorned, we too shall speedily overtake them. Whence then is their adorning? Let both men and women listen. It is not from bracelets, or from necklaces, nor from their eunuchs either, and their maid-servants, and gold-broidered dresses, but from their toils in behalf of the truth. For he says, "who bestowed much labor on us," that is, not on herself only, nor upon her own advancement, (see p. 520) (for this many women of the present day do, by fasting, and sleeping on the floor), but upon others also, so carrying on the race Apostles and Evangelists ran. In what sense then does he say, "I suffer not a woman to teach?" [1 Timothy 2:12] He means to hinder her from publicly coming forward [1 Corinthians 14:35], and from the seat on the bema, not from the word of teaching. Since if this were the case, how would he have said to the woman that had an unbelieving husband, "How do you know, O woman, if you shall save your husband?" [1 Corinthians 7:16] Or how came he to allow her to admonish children, when he says, but "she shall be saved by child-bearing if they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness, with sobriety?" [1 Timothy 2:15] How came Priscilla to instruct even Apollos? It was not then to cut in sunder private conversing for advantage that he said this, but that before all, and which it was the teacher's duty to give in the public assembly; or again, in case the husband be believing and thoroughly furnished, able also to instruct her. When she is the wiser, then he does not forbid her teaching and improving him. And he does not say, who taught much, but "who bestowed much labor," because along with teaching (τοὓ λόγου) she performs other ministries besides, those in the way of dangers, in the way of money, in the way of travels. For the women of those days were more spirited than lions, sharing with the Apostles their labors for the Gospel's sake. In this way they went travelling with them, and also performed all other ministries. And even in Christ's day there followed Him women, "which ministered unto Him of their substance" [Luke 8:3], and waited upon the Teacher.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:6
How can it be that yet another woman is honored and proclaimed victorious! We men are put to shame yet again. Or rather, we are not merely put to shame; we have a different honor conferred on us. For it is an honor to have such women as these among us, though we are put to shame in that we are left so far behind them. But if we come to know why they are so honored, we shall quickly overtake them.What does Paul mean when he says that he does not permit a woman to teach? He means to prevent a woman from coming forward publicly and preaching in the pulpit; he does not stop them from teaching altogether. If this were the case … how would Priscilla have come to instruct Apollos?…
Mary worked hard among them, because along with teaching she performed other ministries besides.… The women of those days were more spirited than lions, sharing with the apostles their labors for the gospel’s sake.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:6
Yet another woman who is praised because of her labors.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:7
It may be that these were Paul’s kinsmen according to the flesh, but the expression “my fellow prisoners” is what fascinates me. When was Paul in captivity? It seems that this was the captivity of sin and that they were together with him in the blindness of unbelief. When Christ came they were set free, as was Paul.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:7
They were Paul’s kinsmen in flesh and in Spirit, as the angel said to Mary: “Behold, your kinswoman Elizabeth.”

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:7
This also looks like an encomium. And what follows is much more so. And what sort is this of? "And my fellow-prisoners." For this is the greatest honor, the noble proclamation. And where was Paul a prisoner, that he should call them "my fellow-prisoners?" A prisoner indeed he had not been, but he had suffered things worse than prisoners, in being not an alien only to his country and his family, but in wrestling with famine and continual death, and thousands of other things. For of a prisoner the only misfortune is this, that he is separated from his relations, and often has to be a slave instead of being free. But in this case one may mention temptations thick as snow-flakes, which this blessed person underwent by being carried and taken about, scourged, fettered, stoned, shipwrecked, with countless people plotting against him. And captives indeed have no further foe after they are led away, but they even experience great care from those who have taken them. But this man was continually in the midst of enemies, and saw spears on every side, and sharpened swords, and arrays, and battles. Since then it was likely that these shared many dangers with him, he calls them fellow-captives. As in another passage also, "Aristarchus my fellow-prisoner." [Colossians 4:10] Then another praise besides. "Who are of note among the Apostles." And indeed to be apostles at all is a great thing. But to be even among these of note, just consider what a great encomium this is! But they were of note owing to their works, to their achievements. Oh! How great is the devotion (φιλοσοφία) of this woman, that she should be even counted worthy of the appellation of apostle! But even here he does not stop, but adds another encomium besides, and says, "Who were also in Christ before me."

For this too is a very great praise, that they sprang forth and came before others. But let me draw your attention to the holy soul, how untainted it is by vanity. For after glory such as his in kind and degree, he sets others before himself, and does not hide from us the fact of his having come after them, nor is ashamed of confessing this. And why are you surprised at his not being ashamed of this, when he shuns not even to parade before men his former life, calling himself "a blasphemer, and a persecutor?" [1 Timothy 1:13] Since then he was not able to set them before others on this score, he looked out himself, who had come in after others, and from this he did find means of bestowing a praise upon them by saying, "Who were in Christ before me."

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:7
It was the greatest of honors to be counted a fellow prisoner of Paul’s.… Think what great praise it was to be considered of note among the apostles. These two were of note because of their works and achievements. Think how great the devotion of this woman Junia must have been, that she should be worthy to be called an apostle! But even here Paul does not stop his praise, for they were Christians before he was.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:7
Yet more praises. These people were companions of Paul in his sufferings and even shared imprisonment with him. Hence he says that they are men and women of note, not among the pupils but among the teachers, and not among the ordinary teachers but among the apostles. He even praises them for having been Christians before him.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:8
Paul greets him as a friend but as a friend in the Lord, because he had not shared Paul’s work or his imprisonment.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:8
Here again he passes encomiums upon his person by his love. For the love of Paul was for God, carrying countless blessings with it. For if being loved by the king is a great thing, what a great encomium must it be to be beloved by Paul? For if he had not acquired great virtue, he would not have attracted his love? Since as for those who live in vice and transgressions he is accustomed (οἶδε]) not only to abstain from loving them, but even to anathematize them. As when he says, "If any man love not the Lord Jesus, let him be accursed" [1 Corinthians 16:22]; and, "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that you have received, let him be accursed." [Galatians 1:8]

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:8
Think what an honor it was to be loved by the apostle Paul. If Ampliatus had not been worthy of this, he would not have attracted Paul’s love.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:8
This is no small praise, for Paul says that he is “beloved in the Lord,” because he behaved uprightly and honestly.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:9
This is a greater encomium than the other. For this even comprehends that. "And Stachys, my beloved." This again is an honor of the same kind.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:9
Urbanus is praised more highly than Ampliatus, and Stachys receives a similar honor.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:9
Paul praises Urbanus more highly than Stachys, because Urbanus had helped him in his preaching and in his struggles.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:10
Paul does not say that those of the family of Aristobulus were beloved, or approved, or fellow workers in Christ. Perhaps they were not any of these things, and so he honors them only with a simple greeting.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:10
Paul does not greet Apelles as a friend or fellow worker, but because he has been tried in temptations and found to be faithful to Christ. Aristobulus is to be understood as having assembled the brethren in Christ. Paul approves of this so much that he regards those whom he has gathered together to be worthy of greeting as well.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:10
There is no praise like this, being unblamable, and giving no handle in the things of God. For when he says, "approved in Christ," he includes the whole list of virtues. And on what ground does he nowhere say my Lord such an one, my Master this? It is because these encomiums were greater than those. For those are mere titles of rank (τιμἥς]), but these are of virtue. And this same honor he paid them not at random, or as addressing several of inferior virtue with the high and great characters. For so far as he is addressing, and that too one along with another, and in the same letter, he honors them all alike. But by stating the praises particularly to each, he sets before us the virtue peculiar to each; so as neither to give birth to envy by honoring one and dishonoring another, nor to work in them listlessness and confusion, by giving them all the same dignity, though they did not deserve the same. See now how he again comes to the admirable women. For after saying, "Salute them which are of Aristobulus' household,"

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:10
There is no praise like this, for the words “approved in Christ” include the whole list of virtues.… By setting out the praises particular to each, he sets before us their individual virtues. He does not excite envy by honoring one and not the other, but neither does he cater to cynicism by praising them all in exactly the same way.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:10
Paul bears witness to the great virtue of Apelles; there was nothing corrupt in him.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:11
Narcissus had a large family, but they were not all Christians, which is why Paul singles out “those in the Lord.”

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:11
When Paul calls Herodion his kinsman and nothing more, he shows that he was faithful in the love of the new birth, but he does not mention his perseverance. Narcissus is said to have been a presbyter of the time, and this is what we find in other manuscripts.… This presbyter Narcissus went about encouraging believers by his preaching. And since Paul did not know what the merits were of those who had been with him, he asks the Romans to greet those of his household who had put their trust in the Lord and who were therefore worthy of his greeting.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:11
Who, it is likely, were not so worthy as the afore-mentioned, on which account also he does not mention them all by name even, and after giving them the encomium which was suited to them, that of being faithful, (and this the meaning of,)

"Which are in the Lord."

He again reverts to the women, and says,

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:11
Paul seems to be implying that there were others in the family of Narcissus who did not yet believe.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:12
Persis appears to be more honored than the other two, because she has worked hard in the Lord. This work is one of encouragement and of service to the saints for Christ’s sake when they are under pressure and in need, because they had fled their homes and were being attacked by unbelievers.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:12
Here again the good things are without any drawback, since the son and the mother are each of such a character, and the house is full of blessing, and the root agrees with the fruit; for he would not have simply said, "his mother and mine," unless he had been bearing testimony to the woman for great virtue.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:12
Once more, praise for work which has been done. This presumably refers to hospitality, or fasting, or some other good work of that kind.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:13
For he [Rufus] was chosen, that is, promoted by the Lord to do his work. Nevertheless he had such a holy mother that the apostle calls her his mother also.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:13
These were Jews, and because they had suffered tribulation along with Paul but like him they had not been intimidated, they are deservedly held in esteem. Among others, they had been sent to further the progress of the Romans, and according to the testimony of Paul himself they are reported to have been believers before him.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:13
The mother of Rufus by nature had become Paul’s mother by grace.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:14
I think this Hermas was the author of the book called The Shepherd of Hermas, which seems to me to be a useful book and one which was inspired by God. I think the reason Paul does not praise him is that he himself tells us in his book that he was converted only after many sins. Scripture tells us not to rush to honor someone who has just repented from sin nor to give him praise as long as the angel of repentance is still over him.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:14
Paul greets these together because he knew that they agreed with one another in Christ and were loyal friends. He also greets the brethren who were with them but omits their names.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:14
Here do not be looking to how he starts them without any encomium, but how he did not reckon them, though far inferior, as it seems, to all, unworthy of being addressed by him. Or rather even this is no slight praise that he even calls them brethren, as also those that are after them he calls saints. For he says,

[AD 420] Jerome on Romans 16:14
Hermas whom the apostle Paul mentions in writing to the Romans "Salute Phlegon, Hermes, Patrobas, Hermas and the brethren that are with them" is reputed to be the author of the book which is called Pastor and which is also read publicly in some churches of Greece. It is in fact a useful book and many of the ancient writers quote from it as authority, but among the Latins it is almost unknown.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:14
This was another family of believers whom Paul thought worthy of praise.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:15
It is possible that Philologus and Julia were married and that the others named here were their domestic servants.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:15
These are understood to have been of one mind because it was for that reason that Paul greeted them together.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:15
Which was the greatest dignity, and unspeakable height of honor. Then to prevent any jealousy rising from his addressing one in one way and another in another, and some by name and some with no distinction, and some with more points of praise, and some with fewer, he again mingles them in the equality of charity, and in the holy kiss, saying,

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:15
By his example Paul teaches us what sort of friends we should greet in our letters, not those who are rich in worldly goods or honored with positions of rank but those who are well supplied in grace and faith.

[AD 215] Clement of Alexandria on Romans 16:16
If we are called to the kingdom of God, let us walk worthy of the kingdom, loving God and our neighbor. Love is not proved by a kiss but by kindly feeling. But there are those who do nothing but make the church resound with a kiss, not having love itself inside them. For this very thing, the shameless use of a kiss, which ought to be mystic, occasions foul suspicions and evil reports. The apostle, however, calls the kiss holy.

[AD 220] Tertullian on Romans 16:16
What prayer is complete if it is divorced from the holy kiss?

[AD 220] Tertullian on Romans 16:16
But when is peace more to be concluded with brethren than when, at the time of some religious observance, our prayer ascends with more acceptability; that they may themselves participate in our observance, and thereby be mollified for transacting with their brother touching. their own peace? What prayer is complete if divorced from the "holy kiss? " Whom does peace impede when rendering service to his Lord? What kind of sacrifice is that from which men depart without peace? Whatever our prayer be, it will not be better than the observance of the precept by which we are bidden to conceal our fasts; for now, by abstinence from the kiss, we are known to be fasting.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:16
From this and other statements like it, it appears that it was the custom to greet one another with a kiss after the prayers. The apostle calls this a holy kiss. How could Paul write that all the churches sent greetings, when he was only in one of them at the time? I think we have to understand this to mean that there was one spirit common to Paul and to all the churches, so that he could speak on behalf of them all.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:16
Paul asks that all those to whom he has written and whom he names be greeted with a holy kiss, that is, in the peace of Christ, not in the desire of the flesh, because these kisses are spiritual, not physical.By saying “churches of Christ” Paul is saying that there is a church which is not Christ’s. For David called the company of evildoers an assembly of the wicked.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:16
To cast out of them, by this salutation, all arguing that confused them, and all grounds for little pride; that neither the great might despise the little, nor the little grudge at the greater, but that haughtiness and envy might be more driven away, when this kiss soothed down and levelled every one. And therefore he not only bids them salute in this way, but sends in like manner to them the greeting from the Churches. For "there salute you," he says, not this or that person individually, but all of you in common,

"The Churches of Christ."

You see that they are no small gains that we earn from these addresses, and what treasures we should have passed hastily over, unless in this part of the Epistle also we had examined it with accuracy, such, I mean, as was in our power. So if there be found any man of wisdom and spiritual, he will dive even deeper, and find a greater number of pearls. But since some have often made it a question wherefore it was that in this Epistle he addressed so many, which thing he has not done in any other Epistle, we might say that it is owing to his never having seen the Romans yet, that he does this. And yet one may say, "Well, he had not seen the Colossians either, and yet he did not do anything of the kind." But these were more honorable than others, and had come there from other cities, as to a safer and more royal city. Since then they were living in a foreign country, and they needed much provision for security, and some of them were of his acquaintance, but some too were there who had rendered him many important services, he with reason commends them by letters; for the glory of Paul was then not little, but so great, that even from his sending them letters, those who had the happiness to have an Epistle to them, gained much protection. For men not only reverenced him, but were even afraid of him. Had this not been so, he would not have said, who had been "a succorer of many, and of myself also." [Romans 16:2] And again, "I could wish that myself were accursed." [Romans 9:3] And to Philemon he wrote and said, "as Paul the aged, and a prisoner of Jesus Christ." [Philippians 9] And to the Galatians, "Behold, I Paul say unto you." [Galatians 5:2] And, "You received me even as Jesus Christ." [Galatians 4:14] And writing to the Corinthians he said, "Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come unto you." [1 Corinthians 4:18] And again, "These things I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos, that you might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written." [1 Corinthians 4:6] Now from all these passages it is clear that all had a great opinion of him. Wishing then that they should feel on easy terms, and be in honor, he addressed each of them, setting forth their praise to the best advantage he might. For one he calls beloved, another kinsman, another both, another fellow-prisoner, another fellow-worker, another approved, another elect. And of the women one he addresses by her title, for he does not call her servant of the Church in an undefined way (because if this were so he would have given Tryphena and Persis this name too), but this one as having the office of deaconess, and another as helper and assistant, another as mother, another from the labors she underwent, and some he addresses from the house they belonged to, some by the name of Brethren, some by the appellation of Saints. And some he honors by the mere fact of addressing them, and some by addressing them by name, and some by calling them first-fruits, and some by their precedence in time, but more than all, Priscilla and Aquila. (τοὺς περὶ Πρ. κ. ᾿Α.) For even if all were believers, still all were not alike, but were different in their merits. Wherefore to lead them all to greater emulation, he keeps no man's encomiums concealed. For when they who labor more, do not receive the greater reward also, many become more listless. On this ground even in the kingdom, the honors are not equal, nor among the disciples were all alike, but the three were preëminent above the rest. And among these three again there was a great difference. For this is a very exact method observed by God even to the last. Hence, "one star differs from another star in glory," [1 Corinthians 15:41], it says. And yet all were Apostles and all are to sit on twelve thrones, and all left their goods, and all companied with Him; still it was the three He took. And again, to these very three, He said it was possible (ἐ γχωρεῖν) that some might even be superior. "For to sit," He says, "on My right hand and on My left, is not mine to give, save to those for whom it is prepared." [Mark 10:40] And He sets Peter before them, when He says, "Lovest thou Me more than these?" [John 21:15] And John too was loved even above the rest. For there shall be a strict examination of all, and if you be but little better than your neighbor, if it be even an atom, or anything ever so little, God will not overlook even this. And this even from of old one might see coming out. For even Lot was a righteous man, yet not so, as was Abraham; and Hezekiah again, yet not so as was David: and all the prophets, yet not so as was John.

Where then are they who with all this great exactness in view, yet will not allow that there is a hell? For if all the righteous are not to enjoy the same lot, if they exceed others even a little ("for one star," it says, "differs from another star in glory,") [1 Corinthians 15:41], how are sinners to be in the same lot with the righteous? Such a confusion as this even man would not make, much less God! But if you will, I will show you that even in the case of sinners, arguing from existing facts, there is this distinction, and exact just judgment. Now consider; Adam sinned, and Eve sinned, and both transgressed, yet they were not equally sinful. And therefore neither were they equally punished. For the difference was so great that Paul said, "Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." And yet the deceit was one. But still God's searching examination pointed out a difference so great, as that Paul should make this assertion. Again, Cain was punished, but Lamech, who committed a murder after him, did not suffer near so great a punishment. And yet this was a murder, and that was a murder, and that so much the worse, because even by the example he had not become the better. But since the one neither killed his brother after exhortation, nor needed an accuser, nor shrunk from answering when God questioned him, but even without any accuser both pleaded again himself, and condemned himself more severely, he obtained pardon. But the other as having done the opposite was punished. See with what exactness God sifts the facts. For this reason He punished those in the flood in one way, and those in Sodom in another; and the Israelites again, both those in Babylon, and those in Antiochus' time, in different ways: so showing that He keeps a strict account of our doings. And these were slaves for seventy years, and those for four hundred, but others again ate their children, and underwent countless other more grievous calamities, and even in this way were not freed, either they or those that were burnt alive in Sodom. "For it shall be more tolerable," He says, "for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha, than for that city." [Matthew 10:15] For if He has no care for us, either when we sin or when we do aright, perhaps there will be some reason in saying that there is no punishment. But since He is so exceedingly urgent about our not sinning, and adopts so many means to keep us in the right, it is very plain that He punishes the wicked, and also crowns those that do right. But let me beg you to consider the unfairness of the generality. For they find fault with God because He so often long-suffering, overlooks so many that are impious, impure, or violent, without now suffering punishment. Again, if He threaten to punish them in the other world, they are vehement and pressing in their accusations. And yet if this be painful, they ought to accept and admire the other. But alas the folly! The unreasonable and asinine spirit! Alas the sin-loving soul, that gazes after vice! For it is from this that all these opinions have their birth. And so if they who utter these things should be minded to lay hold upon virtue, they will presently find themselves satisfied concerning hell also, and will not doubt. And where (it is said) and in what place is this hell? For some fablers say that it is in the valley of Josaphat, thus drawing that which was said about a certain by-gone war, to apply to hell. But the Scripture does not say this. But in what place, pray, will it be? Somewhere as I think at least quite out of the pale of this world. For as the prisons and mines are at a great distance from royal residences, so will hell be somewhere out of this world. Seek we not then to know where it is, but how we may escape it. Neither yet because God does not punish all here, therefore disbelieve things to come. For merciful and long-suffering He is: that is why he threatens, and does not cast us into it immediately. For "I desire not," He says, "the death of a sinner." [Ezekiel 18:32] But if there is no death of a sinner, the words are but idle. And I know indeed that there is nothing less pleasant to you than these words. But to me nothing is pleasanter. And would it were possible at our dinner, and our supper, and our baths, and everywhere, to be discoursing about hell. For we should not then feel the pain at the evils in this world, nor the pleasure of its good things. For what would you tell me was an evil? poverty? Disease? captivity? Maiming of the body? Why all these things are sport compared to the punishment there, even should you speak of those who are tormented with famine all their life long; or those who are maimed from their earliest days, and beg, even this is luxury compared to those other evils. Let us then continually employ ourselves with talking about these things. For to remember hell prevents our falling into hell. Do you not hear St. Paul saying, "Who shall suffer everlasting punishment from the face of the Lord?" [2 Thessalonians 1:9] Do you not hear what Nero's character was, whom Paul even calls the Mystery of Antichrist? For "the mystery of iniquity," he says, "already works." [2 Thessalonians 2:7] What then? Is Nero to suffer nothing? Is Antichrist to suffer nothing? Or the Devil nothing? Then he will always be Antichrist, and so the Devil. For from mischief they will not leave off, unless they be punished. "Yea," you say, "but that there is a hell everybody sees. But the unbelievers only are to fall into it." What is the reason, pray? It is because the believers acknowledge their Master. And what is this to the purpose? When their life is impure, they will on this ground be punished more severely than the unbelievers. "For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: but as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law." [Romans 2:12] And, "The servant that knew his master's will, and did it not, shall be beaten with many stripes." [Luke 12:47] But if there is no such thing as giving an account of one's life, and all this is said in a loose way then neither will the Devil have vengeance taken upon him. For he too knows God, and far more than men too, and all the demons know Him, and tremble, and own He is their Judge. If then there is no giving an account of our life, nor of evil deeds, then will they also clean escape. These things are not so, surely they are not! Deceive not yourselves, beloved. For if there is no hell, how are the Apostles to judge the twelve tribes of Israel? How comes Paul to say, "Do you not know that we shall judge Angels? How much more things of this life?" [1 Corinthians 6:3] How came Christ to say, "The men of Nineveh shall arise and condemn this generation" [Matthew 12:41]; and, "It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment?" [Matthew 11:24] Why then make merry with things that are no subjects for merriment? Why deceive yourself and put cheats upon your reason (παραλογίζῃ, om. τὴν ψυχήνσου)? Why fight with the love of God toward man? For it was through this that He prepared it, and threatened, that we might not be cast into it, as having by this fear become better. And thus he that does away with speaking on these subjects does nothing else than thrust us into it, and drive us there by this deceit. Slacken not the hands of them then that labor for virtue, nor make the listlessness of them that sleep greater. For if the many be persuaded that there is no hell, when will they leave off vice? Or when will right be seen? I do not say between sinners and righteous men, but between sinners and sinners? For why is it that one is punished here, and another not punished, though he does the same sins, or even far worse? For if there be no hell, you will having nothing to say in defense of this to those who make it an objection. Wherefore my advice is, that we leave off this trifling, and stop the mouths of those that are gainsayers upon these subjects. For there will be an exact searching into the smallest things, both in the way of sins and in the way of good deeds, and we shall be punished for unchaste looks, and for idle words, and for mere reproachful words, and for drunkenness we shall render an account, as even for a cup of cold water we shall receive a reward, and a sigh only. [Ecclesiastes 12:14] For it says, "Set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry." [Ezekiel 9:4] How then do you dare to say that He, who with so great exactness will search into our doings, threatened hell in bare words, and lightly? Do not, I beseech you, do not with these vain hopes destroy yourself and those that are persuaded by you! For if you disbelieve our words, make enquiry of Jews and Gentiles, and all heretics. And all of them as with one mouth will answer that a judgment there shall be, and a retribution. And are men not enough? Ask the devils themselves, and you will hear them cry, "Why have you come there to torment us before the time." [Matthew 8:29] And putting all this together persuade your soul not to trifle idly, lest by experience thou come to know there is a hell, but from this you may be sobered, and so able to escape those tortures, and attain to the good things to come; whereof may we all partake by the grace and love towards man, etc.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:16
By this salutation Paul intended to cast out of them any reason for pride. The great were not to despise the small, nor were the small to envy the great, but pride and envy were to be banished by the kiss, which made everyone equal. Therefore, he not only asks them to greet each other in this way, but he also sends them this greeting from the other churches.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:16
Not with a false and treacherous kiss, of the sort with which Judas betrayed the Savior. For in the church the peace is proclaimed first, so that we may show that we are at peace with all who are about to partake of the body of Christ.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:17
Now Paul goes on to mention the false apostles, whom he warns against throughout the epistle just as he does here as well. But he attacks their teaching without saying what it is. They were forcing believers to become Jews and thereby making the benefits of God worthless.… They compiled long genealogies and used them to support their teaching, by which they were deceiving the hearts of the simple.

[AD 400] Pseudo-Clement on Romans 16:17
For these are they "who by good words and fair speeches lead astray the hearts of the simple, and, while offering them blessings, lead them astray." [Romans 16:17-19] Let us, therefore, fear the judgment which awaits teachers. For a severe judgment will those teachers receive "who teach, but do not," [Matthew 23:3] and those who take upon them the name of Christ falsely, and say: We teach the truth, and yet go wandering about idly, and exalt themselves, and make their boast in the mind of the flesh. [Colossians 2:18]

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:17-18
"Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which you have learned, and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple."

Again an exhortation, and prayer after the exhortation. For after telling them to "mark them which cause divisions," and not to listen to them, he proceeds, "And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly:" and, "The grace of our Lord be with you." And notice how gently too he exhorts them: doing it not in the character of a counsellor, but that of a servant, and with much respect. For he calls them brethren, and supplicates them likewise. For, "I beseech you, brethren," (he says). Then he also puts them on the defensive by showing the deceitfulness of those who abused them. For as though they were not at once to be discerned, he says, "I beseech you to mark," that is, to be exceedingly particular about, and to get acquainted with, and to search out thoroughly — whom, pray? Why, "those that cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you have learned." For this is, if anything the subversion of the Church, the being in divisions. This is the devil's weapon, this turns all things upside-down. For so long as the body is joined into one, he has no power to get an entrance, but it is from division that the offense comes. And whence is division? From opinions contrary to the teaching of the Apostles. And whence come opinions of this sort? From men's being slaves to the belly, and the other passions. For "such," he says, "serve not the Lord, but their own belly." And so there would be no offense, there would be no division, unless some opinion were thought of contrary to the doctrine of the Apostles. And this he here points out by saying, "contrary to the doctrine." And he does not say which we have taught, but "which you have learned," so anticipating them, and showing that they were persuaded of and had heard them and received them. And what are we to do to those who make mischief in this way? He does not say have a meeting and come to blows, but "avoid them." For if it was from ignorance or error that they did this, one ought to set them right. But if they sin willingly, spring away from them. And in another place too he says this. For he says, "Withdraw from every brother that walks disorderly" [2 Thessalonians 3:6]: and in speaking to Timothy about the coppersmith, he gives him the like advice, and says, "Of whom also beware." [2 Timothy 4:15] Then also to lash (κωμῳδὥν) those who dare to do such things, he mentions also the reason of their devising this division. "For they that are such," he says, "serve not our Lord Christ, but their own belly." And this he said too when he wrote to the Philippians, "Whose god is their belly." [Philippians 3:19] But here he appears to me to intimate those of the Jews, whom he ever uses particularly to find fault with as gluttonous. For in writing to Titus too, he said of them, "Evil beasts, slow bellies." [Titus 1:12, see 5:10] And Christ also blames them on this head: "You devour widows' houses" [Matthew 23:14], He says. And the Prophets accuse them of things of the kind. For, "My beloved," He says, "has waxen fat and gross, and has kicked" [Deuteronomy 32:15]. Wherefore also Moses exhorted them, and said, "When you have eaten and drunken and are full, remember the Lord your God." (ib. 6:11, 12.) And in the Gospels, they who say to Christ, "What sign do you show unto us?" [John 6:30] pass over everything else, and remember the manna. So do they everywhere appear to be possessed with this affection. How then do you come not to be ashamed at having slaves of the belly for your teachers, when you are a brother of Christ? Now the ground of the error is this, but the mode of attack is again a different disorder, viz. flattery. For it is by "fair speeches," he says, "that they deceive the hearts of the simple." For their attention reaches only to words; but their meaning is not such, for it is full of fraud. And he does not say that they deceive you, but "the hearts of the simple." And even with this he was not satisfied, but with a view to making this statement less grating, he says,

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:17
Division is the subversion of the church. Turning things upside down like this is the devil’s weapon. As long as the body is united he has no way of getting in, but harm comes from division. And where does division come from? From doctrines which are contrary to the teaching of the apostles.

[AD 430] Augustine of Hippo on Romans 16:17
Paul is here discussing the same people he wrote about to Timothy and to Titus. See also Philippians [3:19].

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:17
The people Paul is referring to here were men who defended the law.

[AD 1274] Thomas Aquinas on Romans 16:17
1213. After indicating whom they should greet, the Apostle now shows them whom to avoid. In regard to this he does three things: first, he teaches whom they should avoid; secondly, he gives the reason [v. 18; n. 1218]; thirdly, he promises them divine help to implement this [v. 20; n. 1220]. 1214. And because those whom he wished them to avoid crept in deceptively under the cloak of piety, as it says in Mt (7:15): They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves," he urges them to be cautious, saying: I appeal 603 to you, brethren, to observe those who create dissensions and difficulties in opposition to the doctrine you have been taught. 1215. Here, first of all, it should be noted that to observe is nothing more than to consider carefully: which, of course, is sometimes taken in a good sense and sometimes in an evil sense. It is taken in an evil sense when someone carefully considers the condition and progress of someone in order to inflict harm, as it says in Ps 37 (v. 12): "The wicked plots against the righteous and gnashes his teeth against him," and in Lk (14:1) it says: "And they were watching him." In a good sense it is taken in one way, when one considers God’s precepts to obey them: "Observe him and hearken to his voice" (Ex 23:21). In another way, when a person considers good men to imitate them, as it says in Phil (3:17): "Brethren, join in imitating me and mark those who so live as you have an example in us." Thirdly, the evil are observed as persons to be avoided; and that is the way it is taken here. 1216. For there were certain Jewish converts to the faith who preached that the practices of the Law must be observed. From this followed dissensions and sects in the Church, since some adhered to their error but others continued in the true faith: "Dissension, sects…." (Gal 5:20). Then followed hindrances and stumbling blocks already discussed in v. 14, while some would judge others and some would spurn others who caused dissensions and hindrances: "Remove every obstruction from my people’s way" (Is 57:14). But he says: in opposition to the doctrine you have been taught by the true apostles of Christ, to show that such dissensions and stumbling blocks derive from 604 false doctrine: "If anyone is preaching to you a Gospel other than the one I preached to you, let him be accursed" (Gal 1:9). 1217. Secondly, he warns them that once known they should be avoided; hence he says: Avoid them, i.e., fly from their doctrine and company: "Depart from me, you evildoers" (Ps 119:115). 1218. Then when he says, For such persons, he assigns two reasons for what he had said, the first of which is taken on the part of those whom he wants avoided. First, he describes their condition, saying: Such persons do not serve our Lord Christ but their own bellies. For they preached not for the glory of Christ but for revenue, in order to fill their belly: "For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their god is their belly" (Phil 3:18). Secondly, he describes their deception, saying: by fair and flattering words they deceive the hearts of the simpleminded, i.e., of the innocent and inexperienced: "The simple believe everything" (Pr 14:15). By fair words they pretend to be holy: "They speak peace with their neighbor, while mischief is in their hearts" (Ps 28:3). And blessings, with which they bless and flatter those who follow them: "My people, those who call you blessed mislead you" (Is 3:12); "I will curse your blessings" (Mal 2:2). 1219. He assigns the second reason from a trait of the Romans, who found it easy to follow good and evil. First, he commends them for their readiness to accept the good, saying: Your obedience, by which you obey the faith so easily, is known in every place on account of the dominion the Romans then exercised over other nations. Hence, anything done by the 605 Romans was easily divulged to others. "Your faith is proclaimed in all the world" (Rom 1:8). Therefore, I rejoice over you, because you obey the faith; and this in charity, about which he says in I Cor (13:6) that love does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right. Secondly, he cautions them against evil, saying: I would have you wise in what is good, (5:21); and guileless as to what is evil, lest through some simplicity you slip into evil, that your simplicity be such that you deceive no one into evil: "Be wise as serpents and simple as doves" (Mt 10:16). On the other hand it is said of certain persons: "They are skilled in doing evil, but how to do good they know not" (Jer 4:22). 1220. Then when he says, Then the God of peace, he promises them divine help against such deceivers. First, he makes the promise when he says: But the God of peace, i.e., its author, Who hates the dissensions they cause, will crush Satan, i.e., the devil, who is trying to deceive you through these false apostles, under your feet, because you will overcome him by your wisdom. And he will do this soon, namely, when he comes: "Behold, I have given you power to tread upon serpents and scorpions and over all the power of the enemy" (Lk 10:19); "You shall tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet" (Mal 4:3). Secondly, he says a prayer to obtain this when he says: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you, which is enough to guard you: "My grace is sufficient for you" (2 Cor 12:9). 1221. Then when he says, Timothy, he greets them on the part of others, saying: Timothy, my fellow worker greets you: "I have sent you Timothy, who is my dearest and 606 faithful son in the preaching of the gospel" (I Cor 4:17). He adds: so do Lucius and Jason and Sosipater, my kinsmen, who were Jews. Tertius, Paul’s secretary, was allowed to greet the Romans personally with Paul’s consent. Hence he adds: I, Tertius, the writer of this letter, greet you in the Lord. Then when he says: Gaius, who is my host, was the person to whom John wrote in his third letter commending the charity he exercised toward the saints; and host to the whole church, namely, who were assembled in his house or who were in that region. Then he says: Erastus, the city treasurer, i.e., who guarded the city’s money, and your brother Quartus greet you. 1222. Then he greets them on his own, saying: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen. 1223. He finishes the epistle with thanksgiving, saying: now to him, namely, to God Who is the Trinity, who is able to strengthen you: "After you have suffered a little, he will himself restore, establish and strengthen you" (I Pt 5:10); and this in the faith which is according to the Gospel, namely according to the Gospel I preach: "Whether, then, it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed" (I Cor 15:11); and also according to the preaching of Jesus Christ, Who first preached the Gospel, as it says in Heb (2:3): "It was declared at first by the Lord. Hence Mt (4:23) states that Jesus went about preaching the Gospel of the kingdom. 1224. Then he adds, according to the revelation of the mystery, i.e., the secret, which can refer to what he had said, namely, "according to my Gospel," either because the secret of the divine incarnation is revealed in the Gospel, in accord with the above (1:17), "in it the justice of God is revealed"; or because the Gospel was revealed to the 607 Apostle himself: "God has revealed to us through the Spirit" (I Cor 2:10). Of this secret it says in Is 24(:16), "My secret to myself." Or it can be referred better to the word he had used, "to strengthen." As if to say: God can strengthen you in my Gospel and preaching; and this according to the revelation of the mystery, i.e., of the secret, namely, about the conversion of the Gentiles, as he says in Eph (3:8): "To me the least of saints this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the mystery hidden for ages in God." 1225. Hence, he continues: kept secret for eternal ages, namely, because it had been hidden among men that the Gentiles were to be converted to the faith. He calls these "eternal ages," as though lasting a long time, because this was hidden from the beginning of the world: "Glorious art thou, more wonderful than the eternal mountains" (Ps 76:4). It can be said that the long ages are eternity itself about which Is (57:15) says: "The high and lofty One who inhabits eternity." So that just as the simple essence of God is described in terms of a likeness to bodily dimensions, as Jb (11:9) says: "its measure is longer than the earth and broader than the sea," so His simple eternity is called eternal times, inasmuch as it contains all times. 1226. Then he continues: But which, namely, the mystery, is now disclosed, i.e., about the conversion of the Gentiles, through the prophetic writings, i.e., as the prophets foretold. Hence, he says in Eph (3:5ff): "This mystery was not made known to the sons of men in other generations as it has now been revealed to his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit, that is, now the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body…" But it was made known by fulfillment of a work proceeding from God’s command. Hence, according to the command of the eternal God, Who by an eternal 608 decree accomplishes His will in time. This command of God to bring about the obedience of faith is made known to all nations, i.e., that all nations should obey the faith: "to bring about the obedience of faith among the nations" (Rom 1:5). 1227. But if we speak of the incarnation, the text can be constructed thus: of the mystery, I say, kept secret for eternal ages, because previously it was not so manifest. Which mystery has now been made known through the prophetic writings, which predicted this, according to a command of the eternal God, who willed the mystery of the incarnation to become known, and this to bring about obedience to the faith among all nations. A mystery, I say, known to the wise God alone, because He alone knew it and knew those to whom He wished it to be revealed," for as it says in I Cor (2:11): "no one knows the things of God except the spirit of God." Or it can be understood of Him Who alone is wise, i.e., by His very nature, as it says in Mk (10:18): "No one is good but God alone." This does not exclude the Son, because the perfection of the whole Trinity is the same; just as, conversely, when it is said: "No one knows the Father but he Son" (Mt 11:27), the Father is not excluded from knowledge of Himself. 1228. He adds, through Jesus Christ. This does not mean that the Father is wise through Jesus Christ; because, since in God to be wise is the same as to be, it would follow that the Father would be wise through the Son - which is fallacious. But this must be referred to what he had said above (v. 26): "it is now disclosed." Namely, through Jesus Christ. To whom, i.e., to Jesus Christ, be honor and glory, through the reverence paid by every creature: "At the name of Jesus every knee shall bend" (Phil 2:10), and glory namely, in regard to the full godhead, as Phil (2:11) says: "And every tongue 609 610 confess that Jesus Christ is Lord in the glory of God the Father," not for a time, but for evermore: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever" (Heb 13:8). To confirm its truth he adds: Amen. 1229. Or it can be constructed thus: Known to the only wise God, to whom be glory through Jesus Christ, who glorified God, as it says in Jn (17:4): "I glorified thee on earth."
[AD 386] Cyril of Jerusalem on Romans 16:18
The heretics do this by coating over their poison pills of godless doctrines with the honey of the name of Christ.

[AD 400] Pseudo-Clement on Romans 16:18
That "the harvest is great, but the workmen are few," this also is well-known and manifest. Let us, therefore, "ask of the Lord of the harvest" that He would send forth workmen into the harvest; [Matthew 9:37-38] such workmen as "shall skilfully dispense the word of truth;" workmen "who shall not be ashamed;" faithful workmen; workmen who shall be "the light of the world;" [Matthew 5:14] workmen who "work not for the food that perishes, but for that food which abides unto life eternal;" [John 6:27] workmen who shall be such as the apostles; workmen who imitate the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; who are concerned for the salvation of men; not "hireling" [John 10:12-13] workmen; not workmen to whom the fear of God and righteousness appear to be gain; not workmen who "serve their belly;" not workmen who "with fair speeches and pleasant words mislead the hearts of the innocent;" [Romans 16:18] not workmen who imitate the children of light, while they are not light but darkness — "men whose end is destruction;" [Philippians 3:9] not workmen who practise iniquity and wickedness and fraud; not "crafty workmen;" [2 Corinthians 11:13] not workmen "drunken" and "faithless;" nor workmen who traffic in Christ; not misleaders; not "lovers of money; not malevolent."

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:18
It seems that Paul is talking here about the Jewish leaders.… Their words sound wonderful, but they are deceptive. However, they do not fool everyone but only the hearts of the simple-minded.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:18
Paul is speaking of those who in his day came from among the circumcised and did away with fasts and abstinence. Disagreeing with apostolic teaching and setting obstacles before the brethren, they preached new moons and sabbaths and other feast days for the sake of their stomach.

[AD 420] Jerome on Romans 16:18
Flattery is always insidious, deceitful and bland. And a flatterer is well defined by philosophers as a bland enemy. Truth is harsh, bitter, stern, unpleasant and offensive to those who are reproved.

[AD 215] Clement of Alexandria on Romans 16:19
On account of the hearts of the innocent, the apostle, in the Epistle to the Romans, owns that he rejoices, and furnishes a kind of definition of children, so to speak, when he says, "I would have you wise toward good, but simple towards evil."

[AD 215] Clement of Alexandria on Romans 16:19
The apostle admits that he rejoices because of the hearts of the innocent, and [in this verse] he gives a kind of definition of being as a child.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:19
This is similar to what Paul wrote to the Corinthians when he said: “Be babes in evil, but in your thinking be mature.” The Lord also said much the same thing: “The children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light.”

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:19
Being “wise as to what is good” means doing good works, while being “guileless as to what is evil” means avoiding unrighteous deeds.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:19
This he does, not to leave them free to be shameless, but to win them beforehand with encomiums, and the number of his witnesses, to arrest their attention. For neither is it I alone that am the witness, but the whole world. And he does not say for your understanding, but, "your obedience:" that is, their compliance, which was evidence of much meekness in them. "I am glad therefore on your behalf." And this is no small encomium too. Then, after the praise, admonition. For lest, after liberating them from any charges against them, he should make them the more listless, as not being observed; he gives them another hint in the words,

"I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil."

You see then how he attacks them again, and that without their suspecting it. For this looks like intimating that some of them were apt to be led astray.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:19
If you obeyed those you should not have obeyed, how much more should you obey us! For this is why these people came to you, because they knew that you could readily be led astray by unsuspecting obedience. I rejoice with you, because obedience is good only if it is reasonable. I want you to be wise in what is good, so that by being ignorant of evil you may bring the enemy down under the feet of innocence.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:20
It seems to me that “Satan” here refers to any spirit which is opposed to God. For in our language, Satan means “adversary.”But just as the apostle teaches that if they behave and demonstrate that they are the kind of people he says they are, then he promises that Satan will soon be crushed under their feet by the God of peace, so the same God of peace will stir up Satan in the hearts of those who do not keep his peace with a pure heart and a clean conscience. Thus whoever neglects the blessing of peace will suffer the bitter pangs of the adversaries until he remembers the sweetness of the peace which he has rejected. Therefore we are edified by both of these things, for God is said to stir up Satan against those who neglect him and to subdue him for the benefit of those who dedicate themselves to him, giving them the palm of victory over their vanquished foe and pouring out on them the rewards of victory.

[AD 258] Cyprian on Romans 16:20
For, in the proceedings before the proconsul; as a good and true teacher you first have pronounced that which we your disciples, following you, ought to say before the president. And, as a sounding trumpet, you have stirred up God's soldiers, furnished with heavenly arms, to the close encounter; and fighting in the first rank, you have slain the devil with a spiritual sword: you have also ordered the troops of the brethren, on the one hand and on the other, with your words, so that snares were on all sides laid for the enemy, and the severed sinews of the very carcase of the public foe were trodden under foot. Believe us, dearest, that your innocent spirit is not far from the hundred-fold reward, seeing that it has feared neither the first onsets of the world, nor shrunk from going into exile, nor hesitated to leave the city, nor dreaded to dwell in a desert place; and since it furnished many with an example of confession, itself first spoke the martyr-witness. For it provoked others to acts of martyrdom by its own example; and not only began to be a companion of the martyrs already departing from the world, but also linked a heavenly friendship with those who should be so.

[AD 300] Theonas of Alexandria on Romans 16:20
And then also shall ye do away with all ill-will, and bruise the head of that ancient serpent,
[AD 380] Apostolic Constitutions on Romans 16:20
And after that let him proclaim: Ye penitents, pray; let us all earnestly pray for our brethren in the state of penitence, that God, the lover of compassion, will show them the way of repentance, and accept their return and their confession, and bruise Satan under their feet suddenly,

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:20
Paul says this about his own coming to them, for then he will crush the devil so that they will be able to receive spiritual grace. Satan gets angry at that, because he wants people to remain in sin. The grace which he has promised he will give them when he comes he now prays that they will have. For if they deserve to receive that grace, then he is already with them in spirit.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:20
For since he had spoken of those who "caused divisions and offenses among them," he has mentioned "the God of peace" also, that they might feel hopeful about the riddance of these evils. For he that rejoices in this (i.e., peace) will put an end to that which makes havoc of it. And he does not say, will subject, but "will bruise" [Genesis 3:19], which is a stronger expression. And not those people only, but also him who was the general over them herein, Satan. And not "will bruise" merely, but "under your feet," so that they may obtain the victory themselves, and become noble by the trophy. And the time again is made a ground of comfort. For he adds, "shortly." And this was prayer and prophecy as well at once. "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you."

That greatest weapon; that impregnable wall; that tower unshaken! For he reminds them of the grace, that he may give them the more alacrity. Because if you have been freed from the ills more grievous by far, and freed by grace only, much more will you be freed from the lesser, now you have become friends too, and contribute your own share likewise. You see how he neither puts prayer without works, nor works without prayer. For after giving them credit for their obedience, than he prays; to show that we need both, our own part as well as God's part, if we are to be duly saved. For it was not before only, but now too, even though we be great and in high esteem, we need grace from Him.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:20
The Lord has given us power to tread upon scorpions and snakes and every power of the enemy so that he may not prevail over us and so that we can walk over him with all our members free and unfettered.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:20
After revealing the enemy, Paul points to the Savior. Those who receive God’s grace will never be defeated.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:21
Timothy is well known from the Acts of the Apostles, where it is recorded that he was from Derbe, the son of a believing widow and of a Gentile father. Paul asked him to remain at Ephesus in order to warn the people there not to teach anything different from what they had been taught nor to listen to myths and endless genealogies.Lucius may have been the same person as Luke the Evangelist, because names are sometimes given in the native form and sometimes in the Greek or Roman one.
Jason is the same person as the one who, when there were riots against Paul and Silas at Thessalonica, posted a bond for them so that they might have the freedom to preach. Sosipater was the son of Pyrrhus, from Berrhoea. … Paul calls them all his kinsmen because, although they were Gentiles, they were his brethren in the faith.

[AD 380] Apostolic Constitutions on Romans 16:21
Rough the whole world, and have left to you the bishops and to the rest of the priests this very Catholic doctrine worthily and righteously, as a memorial or confirmation to those who have believed in God; and we have sent it by our fellow-minister Clement, our most faithful and intimate son in the Lord, together with Barnabas, and Timothy our most dearly beloved son, and the genuine Mark, together with whom we recommend to you also Titus and Luke, and Jason and Lucius, and Sosipater.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:21
Timothy was a fellow worker of Paul’s as a cobishop, and he governed the church with great care. The Jews hated him to the point that he was circumcised because of it, in that his mother was Jewish and he could not be a teacher without being circumcised. Paul calls these people his kinsmen, partly by blood and partly by faith.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:21
Observe the customary encomiums again. "And Lucius, and Jason, and Sosipater my kinsmen."

This Jason Luke also mentions, and sets before us his manliness also, when he says, that "they drew" him "to the rulers of the city, crying," etc. [Acts 17:5] And it is likely that the others too were men of note. For he does not mention relations barely, unless they were also like him in religiousness.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:21
Timothy was circumcised at Lystra and Paul wrote him two letters. Jason is mentioned in Acts.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:22
Tertius was his name, not a number [third]. He was the scribe who wrote the epistle, and Paul allowed him to send his own greetings to the Romans.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:22
This too is no small encomium, to be Paul's amanuensis. Still it is not to pass encomiums on himself that he says this, but that he might attach a warm love to him on their part, for this ministration.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:22
Tertius was another of those who had accepted the apostle’s teaching. Being rewarded for this with the gift of expression, he was told to send this letter to the Romans.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:23
This is the same Gaius whom Paul mentioned as having baptized at Corinth. Paul would not have mentioned that Erastus was the city treasurer if he did not intend a spiritual meaning as well, viz., that Erastus was the treasurer or paymaster of that city whose builder and maker is God. This is why he did not indicate in what city Erastus served as treasurer!

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:23
I think that this is the same Gaius to whom John wrote rejoicing in the love which he showed to the brethren by being always ready to meet their needs.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:23
See what a crown he has framed for him by bearing witness to such great hospitality in him, and brought in the entire Church into this man's house! For by the word ξένον], used here, he means a host, not a . But when you hear that he was Paul's host, do not admire him for his munificence only, but also for his strictness of life. For except he were worthy of Paul's excellency, he would never have lodged there, since he, who took pains to go beyond many of Christ's commands, would never have trespassed against that law, which bids us be very particular about who receive us, and about lodging with "worthy" persons. [Matthew 10:11] "Erastus, the chamberlain of the city, salutes you, and Quartus a brother." There is a purpose in his adding "the chamberlain of the city," for as he wrote to the Philippians, "They of Cæsar's household salute you" [Philippians 4:22], that he might show that the Gospel had taken a hold upon great folk, so here too he mentions the title with a view to the same object, and to show that, to the man who gives heed, neither riches are a hindrance, nor the cares of government, nor anything else of the kind.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:23
When you hear that Gaius was Paul’s host, admire him not only for his generosity but also for his strictness of life. For if he were not worthy of Paul’s standards, the apostle would never have lodged there.Paul mentions Erastus’s title with the purpose of showing that the gospel had taken hold among the great as well as among the rest of the population.… To a man who hears the Word, riches are not a hindrance, nor the cares of government, nor anything else of that kind.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:23
The highest praise is reserved for hospitality on such a scale.… Gaius was a Corinthian, as appears from 1 Corinthians [1:14]: “I thank my God that I baptized none of you, except Crispus and Gaius.” … Erastus is also mentioned elsewhere, in 2 Timothy [4:20].

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:24
Marcion, who interpolated both the Gospels and the Epistles, deleted this passage [Romans 16:24] from the text, and not only this but everything [after 16:25] as well. In other manuscripts not edited by Marcion we find this passage in different places. Some have it immediately after [16:25], and others have it here, at the end of the epistle.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:24
Paul places Christ, through whom we were made and again remade by his grace, at the end of his epistle so that he might stick in our minds, for if we are mindful of his benefits he will always look after us, as he said: “Behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the world.”

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:24
See what we ought to begin and to end with everywhere! For in this he laid the foundation of the Epistle, and in this he puts on the roof, at once praying for the mother of all good things for them, and calling the whole of his loving-kindness to their mind. For this is the best proof of a generous teacher, to benefit his learners not by word only, but likewise by prayer, for which cause also one said, "But let us give ourselves continually to prayers, and to the ministry of the word." [Acts 6:4]

Who is there then to pray over us, since Paul has departed? These who are the imitators of Paul. Only let us yield ourselves worthy of such intercession (συνηγορίας]), that it may not be that we hear Paul's voice here only, but that hereafter, when we are departed, we may be counted worthy to see the wrestler of Christ. Or rather, if we hear him here, we shall certainly see him hereafter, if not as standing near him, yet see him we certainly shall, glistening near the Throne of the king. Where the Cherubim sing the glory, where the Seraphim are flying, there shall we see Paul, with Peter, and as a chief and leader of the choir of the Saints, and shall enjoy his generous love. For if when here he loved men so, that when he had the choice of departing and being with Christ, he chose to be here, much more will he there display a warmer affection. I love Rome even for this, although indeed one has other grounds for praising it, both for its greatness, and its antiquity, and its beauty, and its populousness, and for its power, and its wealth, and for its successes in war. But I let all this pass, and esteem it blessed on this account, that both in his lifetime he wrote to them, and loved them so, and talked with them whiles he was with us, and brought his life to a close there. Wherefore the city is more notable upon this ground, than upon all others together. And as a body great and strong, it has as two glistening eyes the bodies of these Saints. Not so bright is the heaven, when the sun sends forth his rays, as is the city of Rome, sending out these two lights into all parts of the world. From thence will Paul be caught up, from thence Peter. Just bethink you, and shudder (φρίξατε) at the thought of what a sight Rome will see, when Paul arises suddenly from that deposit, together with Peter, and is lifted up to meet the Lord. [1 Thessalonians 4:17] What a rose will Rome send up to Christ! [Isaiah 35:1] what two crowns will the city have about it! What golden chains will she be girded with! What fountains possess! Therefore I admire the city, not for the much gold, not for the columns, not for the other display there, but for these pillars of the Church. [1 Corinthians 15:38] Would that it were now given me to throw myself round (περιχυθἥναι) the body of Paul, and be riveted to the tomb, and to see the dust of that body that "filled up that which was lacking" after "Christ" [Colossians 1:24], that bore "the marks" (στίγματα,) [Galatians 6:17] that sowed the Gospel everywhere yea, the dust of that body through which he ran to and fro everywhere! The dust of that body through which Christ spoke, and the Light shone forth more brilliant than any lightning, and the voice started out, more awful than any thunder to the devils! Through which he uttered that blessed voice, saying, "I could wish that myself were accursed, for my brethren" [Romans 9:3], through which he spoke "before kings, and was not ashamed!" [Psalm 119:46] through which we come to know Paul through which also Paul's Master! Not so awful to us is the thunder, as was that voice to the demons! For if they shuddered at his clothes [Acts 19:12], much more did they at his voice. This led them away captive, this cleansed out the world, this put a stop to diseases, cast out vice, lifted the truth on high, had Christ riding upon it, and everywhere went about with Him; and what the Cherubim were, this was Paul's voice, for as He was seated upon those Powers, so was He upon Paul's tongue. For it had become worthy of receiving Christ, by speaking those things only which were acceptable to Christ, and flying as the Seraphim to height unspeakable! For what more lofty than that voice which says, "For I am persuaded that neither Angels, nor Principalities, nor Powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus?" [Romans 8:38-39] What pinions does not this discourse seem to you to have? What eyes? [Ezekiel 10:12] It was owing to this that he said, "for we are not ignorant of his devices." [2 Corinthians 2:11] Owing to this did the devils flee not only at hearing him speak, but even at seeing his garments. This is the mouth, the dust whereof I would fain see, through which Christ spoke the great and secret things, and greater than in His own person, (for as He wrought, so He also spoke greater things by the disciples, ) through which the Spirit gave those wondrous oracles to the world! For what good thing did not that mouth effect? Devils it drove out, sins it loosed, tyrants it muzzled, philosophers' mouths it stopped, the world it brought over to God, savages it persuaded to learn wisdom, all the whole order of the earth it altered. Things in Heaven too it disposed what way it listed [1 Corinthians 5:3-4], binding whom it would, and loosing in the other world, "according unto the power given unto it." [2 Corinthians 13:10] Nor is it that mouth only, but the heart too would fain see the dust of, which a man would not do wrong to call the heart of the world, and a fountain of countless blessings, and a beginning, and element of our life. For the spirit of life was furnished out of it all, and was distributed through the members of Christ, not as being sent forth by arteries, but by a free choice of good deeds. This heart was so large, as to take in entire cities, and peoples, and nations. "For my heart" he says, "is enlarged." [2 Corinthians 6:11] Yet even a heart thus large, did this very charity that enlarged it many a time straiten and oppress. For he says, "Out of much affliction (θλίψεως) and anguish (συνοχἥς) of heart I wrote to you." [2 Corinthians 2:4] I were desirous to see that heart even after its dissolution, which burned at each one that was lost, which travailed a second time with the children that had proved abortions [Galatians 4:19], which saw God, ("for the pure in heart," He says, "shall see God,") [Matthew 5:8] which became a Sacrifice, ("for a sacrifice to God is a contrite heart,") [Psalm 51:17] which was loftier than the heavens, which was wider than the world, which was brighter than the sun's beam, which was warmer than fire, which was stronger than adamant, which sent forth rivers, ("for rivers," it says, "of living water shall flow out of his belly,") [John 7:38] wherein was a fountain springing up, and watering, not the face of the earth, but the souls of men, whence not rivers only, but even fountains of tears, issued day and night, which lived the new life, not this of ours, (for "I live," he says, "yet not I, but Christ lives in me," [Galatians 2:20] so Paul's heart was His heart, and a tablet of the Holy Spirit, and a book of grace); which trembled for the sins of others, (for I fear, he says, lest by any means "I have bestowed labor upon you in vain; [Galatians 4:11] lest as the serpent beguiled Eve; [2 Corinthians 11:3] lest when I come I should find you not such as I would;") [2 Corinthians 12:20] which both feared for itself, and was confiding too, (for I fear, he says, "lest by any means after having preached to others I myself should be a castaway," [1 Corinthians 9:27] And, "I am persuaded that neither angels nor powers shall be able to separate us;") [alluding to Romans 9:3] which was counted worthy to love Christ as no other man loved Him: which despised death and hell, yet was broken down by brothers' tears, (for he says, "what mean ye to weep and to break mine heart?") [Acts 21:13] which was most enduring, and yet could not bear to be absent from the Thessalonians by the space of an hour! [1 Thessalonians 2:17; 3:10] Fain would I see the dust of hands that were in a chain, through the imposition of which the Spirit was furnished, through which the divine writings were written, (for "behold how large a letter I have written unto you with my own hand:" [] and again, "The salutation of me Paul with my own hand,") [1 Corinthians 16:21] of those hands at the sight of which the serpent "fell off into the fire." [Acts 28:5] Fain would I see the dust of those eyes which were blinded gloriously, which recovered their sight again for the salvation of the world; which even in the body were counted worthy to see Christ, which saw earthly things, yet saw them not, which saw the things which are not seen, which saw not sleep, which were watchful at midnight, which were not effected as eyes are. I would also see the dust of those feet, which ran through the world and were not weary; which were bound in the stocks when the prison shook, which went through parts habitable or uninhabited, which walked on so many journeys. And why need I speak of single parts? Fain would I see the tomb, where the armor of righteousness is laid up, the armor of light, the limbs which now live, but which in life were made dead; and in all whereof Christ lived, which were crucified to the world, which were Christ's members, which were clad in Christ, were a temple of the Spirit, an holy building, "bound in the Spirit," [Acts 20:22] riveted to the fear of God, which had the marks of Christ. This body is a wall to that City, which is safer than all towers, and than thousands of battlements. And with it is that of Peter. For he honored him while alive. For he "went up to see Peter," [Galatians 1:18] and therefore even when departed grace deigned to give him the same abode with him. Fain would I see the spiritual Lion. For as a lion breathing (Gr. sending,) [Canticles 2:15] forth fire (πὕρ ἀφιεὶς) upon the herds of foxes, so rushed he upon the clan of demons and philosophers, and as the burst of some thunderbolt, was borne down into the host of the devil. [Luke 13:32] For he did not even come to set the battle in array against him, since he feared so and trembled at him, as that if he saw his shadow, and heard his voice, he fled even at a distance. And so did he deliver over to him the fornicator, though at a distance, and again snatched him out of his hands [1 Corinthians 5:5; 2 Corinthians 2:7-11]; and so others also, that they might be taught "not to blaspheme." [1 Timothy 1:20] And consider how he sent forth his own liegemen against him, rousing them, suppling them. And at one time he says to the Ephesians, "We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers." [Ephesians 6:12] Then too he puts our prize in heavenly places. For we struggle not for things of the earth, he says, but for Heaven, and the things in the Heavens. And to others, he says, "Do you not know that we shall judge Angels? How much more the things of this life?" [1 Corinthians 6:3] Let us then, laying all this to heart, stand nobly; for Paul was a man, partaking of the same nature with us, and having everything else in common with us. But because he showed such great love toward Christ, he went up above the Heavens, and stood with the Angels. And so if we too would rouse ourselves up some little, and kindle in ourselves that fire, we shall be able to emulate that holy man. For were this impossible, he would never have cried aloud, and said, "Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ." [1 Corinthians 11:1] Let us not then admire him only, or be struck with him only, but imitate him, that we too may, when we depart hence, be counted worthy to see him, and to share the glory unutterable, which God grant that we may all attain to by the grace and love toward man of our Lord Jesus Christ, through Whom, and with Whom, be glory to the Father, with the Holy Ghost, now and evermore. Amen.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:24
This is where we ought to begin and end! The best proof of a generous teacher is that he benefits his learners not by word only but also by prayer.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:24
This is the closing formula, written in Paul’s own hand, in all his letters.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:24
Once again Paul offers them a spiritual blessing and surrounds them with the grace of God, which is like an impenetrable wall. This is how the epistle began and this is how it ends. We too may share in this grace, triumphing over temptations and, enlightened by it, following the right way free of all error. Walking in the apostle’s footsteps we may be made worthy to behold the teacher and by his intercession receive the Lord’s blessing and promises, by the grace and kindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit belong glory and honor, now and forever, world without end. Amen.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:25
Paul wants to show that there are two ways in which those who believe in the gospel are strengthened. One is by his preaching, which is the preaching of Christ. The other is by the revelation of the mystery which was kept secret for long ages and which has now been revealed in Christ … not without suitable witnesses but with the backing of the prophetic Scriptures.

[AD 325] Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius on Romans 16:25
But though He is Himself also a spirit, yet He proceeded from the mouth of God with voice and sound, as the Word, on this account indeed, because He was about to make use of His voice to the people; that is, because He was about to be a teacher of the knowledge of God, and of the heavenly mystery
[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:25
Paul gives glory to God the Father, from whom are all things, that he might be pleased to fill the congregation of the Romans with his grace, as he can do by confirming their minds in faith for the advancing of the gospel and the revelation of the mystery hidden for long ages, which has now been made manifest in Christ.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:25
Here Paul prays for them on the assumption that they are not yet firmly fixed but are still wavering. In order to back up what he says, he bases it all on “the preaching of Jesus Christ,” by which he means the things that Jesus himself preached. For if Christ preached it, the teaching is not Paul’s, but his.… Furthermore, to be let in on the secret, especially on one which had been kept for such a long time, is a sign of the greatest intimacy and friendliness.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:25
God strengthens us with signs and teachings, so that you may live in the way that Paul has preached by the example and authority of Christ.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:25
Paul says this in order to remind us of how old the gospel actually is.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:26
Although the message is made known to all nations, it is not made known to all people, because only a few chosen ones are able to understand the wisdom and knowledge of God, of whom it is said: “Many are called, but few are chosen.”

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:26
Those who advance in the knowledge of Christianity do not treat the things written in the law with disrespect. On the contrary, they bestow even greater honor upon them, showing what a depth of wise and mysterious reasons is contained in these writings, which are not fully comprehended by the Jews, who treat them superficially and even as if they were to some extent mythical.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:26
The mystery which is eternally hidden in God was revealed in the time of Christ, for God is not alone, but from all eternity he has his Word and the Paraclete with him. God decreed that every creature was to be saved by coming to a knowledge of this truth. For the truth of this mystery had been indicated by the prophets in symbols, and it was known only to God.… This wisdom is Jesus Christ, who is from God and was with God forever.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:26
By saying this Paul is releasing the weak person from fear. For this secret was contained in the law. Indeed, it is what the law was all about. We cannot ask why it should be disclosed now, for to do this would be to call God to account. We ought not to behave like busybodies but instead be content with what we have been given.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:26
The mystery of the calling of all the Gentiles, which through Paul’s gospel, using the testimonies of the prophets, had now been plainly disclosed in Christ, had long been hidden in the law. Although the prophets had said many things about the Gentiles, none had recognized as clearly as Paul how Gentiles and Jews would become one in Christ. For they had been able to determine that some should be admitted to the faith as proselytes.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:26
The obedience of faith is the result of the preaching of the gospel.

[AD 253] Origen of Alexandria on Romans 16:27
God cannot be called wise in the way that human beings are wise, because a wise man merely has a share in wisdom, whereas God is its author and source.

[AD 384] Ambrosiaster on Romans 16:27
Without Christ nothing is complete, because all things are through him. It is acknowledged that praise is given to God the Father through him, because it is understood that “through Christ” means “through his wisdom,” in whom he has saved believers. Therefore glory to the Father through the Son is glory to both in the Holy Spirit, because both are in the one glory.

[AD 407] John Chrysostom on Romans 16:27
Do not think that Paul said this in disparagement of the Son. For if all the things whereby his wisdom was made apparent were done by Christ and nothing was done without him, it is quite plain that the Son is equal to the Father in wisdom also. The word only is used in order to contrast God with every created being.

[AD 418] Pelagius on Romans 16:27
God commanded that all the Gentiles obey and acknowledge God. He alone knew that this would one day happen, for he alone is naturally wise just as he is naturally good. Mankind is also called good, it is true, but we have the ability to be good or wise as a result of instruction, whereas God is good and wise by nature. To him be glory and honor through Jesus Christ forever. Amen.

[AD 420] Jerome on Romans 16:27
God alone is wise, although both Solomon and many other holy men were called wise.

[AD 458] Theodoret of Cyrus on Romans 16:27
If the heretics try to use this [verse] to prove that Christ is not God, it should be remembered that Christ not only is called wise, he is even called Wisdom.