Philippians 1:1

He keeps silence about his status as an apostle. He is writing to people who already know who he is and have an informed opinion of him. He suppresses his dignity. He declares his lowly state, because the one who confesses Christ as Lord is all the more free and has salvation.

He writes to the saints in his customary manner, but his intent is to write to those who are "saints in Christ Jesus," specifically those who confess that he is divine and human.… He is not writing to those who by their own deceptions suppress the truth.

Here, as writing to those of equal honor, he does not set down his rank of Teacher, but another, and that a great one. And what is that? He calls himself a "servant," and not an Apostle. For great truly is this rank too, and the sum of all good things, to be a servant of Christ, and not merely to be called so. "The servant of Christ," this is truly a free man in respect to sin, and being a genuine servant, he is not a servant to any other, since he would not be Christ's servant, but by halves. And in again writing to the Romans also, he says, "Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ." But writing to the Corinthians and to Timothy he calls himself an "Apostle." On what account then is this? Not because they were superior to Timothy. Far from it. But rather he honors them, and shows them attention, beyond all others to whom he wrote. For he also bears witness to great virtue in them. For besides, there indeed he was about to order many things, and therefore assumed his rank as an Apostle. But here he gives them no injunctions but such as they could perceive of themselves.

"To the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi." Since it was likely that the Jews too would call themselves "saints" from the first oracle, when they were called a "holy people, a people for God's own possession"; for this reason he added, "to the saints in Christ Jesus." For these alone are holy, and those henceforth profane. "To the fellow-Bishops and Deacons." What is this? were there several Bishops of one city? Certainly not; but he called the Presbyters so. For then they still interchanged the titles, and the Bishop was called a Deacon. For this cause in writing to Timothy, he said, "Fulfil thy ministry," when he was a Bishop. For that he was a Bishop appears by his saying to him, "Lay hands hastily on no man." And again, "Which was given thee with the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery." Yet Presbyters would not have laid hands on a Bishop. And again, in writing to Titus, he says, "For this cause I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldest appoint elders in every city, as I gave thee charge. If any man is blameless, the husband of one wife"; which he says of the Bishop. And after saying this, he adds immediately, "For the Bishop must be blameless, as God's steward, not self willed." So then, as I said, both the Presbyters were of old called Bishops and Deacons of Christ, and the Bishops Presbyters; and hence even now many Bishops write, "To my fellow-Presbyter," and, "To my fellow-Deacon." But otherwise the specific name is distinctly appropriated to each, the Bishop and the Presbyter.

He sends his news to everyone, both those who have been deemed worthy of ordination and those who are shepherded by them. By "those who are holy" he means those who have worthily received holy baptism.

He applies the term bishops to presbyters, for at that time they had both names. … And it is clear that he makes this assumption here also. For he joins the deacons to the bishops, making no mention of the presbyters. Furthermore, it was not possible for many bishops to be shepherds to one city. So it is clear that he is calling the presbyters bishops; yet in this same letter he calls the blessed Epaphroditus their apostle, … and thus he indicates plainly that he was entrusted with an episcopal function because he had the name of an apostle.

Here the apostle does not put forward his apostolic dignity, but simply calls himself a servant of Jesus Christ. This title is certainly great as well, only it is of a more general character. But when he writes to Timothy and the Corinthians, he calls himself an apostle. Why is this? Because there he wished to set many things in order, and therefore put forward his apostolic dignity. But here he commands nothing of the sort, but rather considers them as equals to himself.

Since the Jews also called themselves holy, because they were a holy nation, the apostle added "in Christ Jesus," because those who are in Christ Jesus are truly holy, while those (Jews) are unclean.

He called the presbyters here bishops, since there were not many bishops in one city. At that time there was not yet a distinction in titles, and the bishops themselves were called deacons and presbyters. Therefore, when Paul wrote to Timothy as a bishop, he said, "fulfill your ministry" (τὴν διακονίαν) (2 Tim. 4:5), and then: "which was given you with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery" (1 Tim. 4:14), that is, of the bishops, because presbyters did not ordain a bishop. On the other hand, presbyters were also called bishops (ἐπίσκοποι), since they too, evidently, watched over the people in order to cleanse and enlighten those in need. Why then does he now write to the clergy, which he nowhere else did? Because they themselves had sent Epaphroditus, who brought to the apostle what he needed.

This letter is divided into a greeting and a message (1:3). In the greeting he does three things: first, the persons who send the greeting are described; secondly, the persons greeted (1:1); thirdly, the good things he wishes them (1:2). In regard to the first he does two things: first, he mentions the persons who send the greeting; secondly, their condition (1:1).

In regard to the first he mentions, first of all, the principal person, when he says, Paul, which means "small." In this he indicates his humility: "The least one shall become a clan, and the smallest one a mighty nation" (Is. 60:22). Secondly, the co-sender, when he says, and Timothy, because he was their preacher: "I have no one like him, who will be genuinely anxious for your welfare" (2:20).

Then when he says, servants of Christ Jesus, he states their condition: "For what we preach is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake" (2 Cor. 4:5). But this seems to conflict with John (15:15): "No longer do I call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing." I answer that there are two kinds of servitude, corresponding to the two kinds of fear. Fear of punishment causes evil servitude, and this is the kind meant in the above text from John. But chaste fear causes reverential servitude, which is the kind the Apostle has in mind.

The persons greeted are the saints of the Church in Philippi: first, the lesser ones; hence he says, to all the saints who are at Philippi, which is a city founded by Philip. He calls them saints on account of their baptism: "Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?" (Rom. 6:3). He includes the greater ones when he says, with the bishops and deacons. But why does he mention the lesser ones before the greater? Because the people are prior to the prelate: "Should not shepherds feed the sheep?" (Ez. 34:2). For the flocks are to be fed by the shepherds, and not vice versa. But why does he not mention the priests? I answer that they are included with the bishops, because there are not a number of bishops in a city; hence when he puts it in the plural, he means to include priests. Yet it is a distinct order, because we read in the gospel that after appointing twelve apostles (whose persons the bishops manifest), He appointed seventy-two disciples, whose place the priests hold. Dionysius also distinguished bishops from priests. But in the beginning, although the orders were distinct, there were not distinct names for the orders; hence here he includes priests with bishops.