HistoricalChristian.Faith

Bar Hebraeus on the Rabbinic Corruption of Scripture

Dates: c. 1286 (the Chronography / Maktbānūt Zabnē worked on from c. 1275 to his death, 30 July 1286) · Wikipedia
Summary: The great Syriac Orthodox polymath — maphrian of the East, physician, philosopher, and historian (Gregory Abū al-Faraj, "Bar Hebraeus," son of the Hebrew) — is the late-medieval terminus of the chronology strand, but a negative witness, and his page is here to set the record straight. His great Chronography follows the Septuagint's longer reckoning of Genesis 5–11 and flatly tabulates the divergent "Syrian and Hebrew" totals beside it — yet it levels no charge of deliberate Jewish tampering. The modern deflation camp (Henry B. Smith Jr.) repeatedly lists Bar Hebraeus among the chronographers who held the rabbis "deliberately deflated" the chronology, but the listing does not survive inspection: Smith quotes no words of Bar Hebraeus, the explanatory note in the Chronography that accounts for the divergences is the modern editor Bedjan's (and ascribes them to which version the author followed, not to corruption), and even the one Bar Hebraeus sentence later produced is a bare statement of the numeric difference. He held every material of the charge and drew none of it — the measure, at the strand's far end, of how thin its textual base is.

Claims & evidence

He follows the Septuagint chronology and tabulates the shorter Hebrew/Syriac total — without accusation

"And from ADAM to the death of MOSES is three thousand eight hundred (or, four hundred) and fifty years, according to ANIANUS the monk, and this computation agreeth with his. According to the Septuagint, however, it is three thousand eight hundred (or, four hundred) and eighty-two years, and according the Syrian and Hebrew [Books] it is two thousand four hundred and twenty [years]."

Bar Hebraeus, The Chronography, trans. E. A. Wallis Budge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932), "The Patriarchs. From Adam to Moses," source.1 A neutral three-way tabulation — Anianus, Septuagint, "Syrian and Hebrew" — with no word of malice attached to the shorter figure. Through the patriarchal section Bar Hebraeus gives the antediluvian begetting-ages in their longer, Septuagint form (Adam begets Seth "when he was two hundred and thirty years old"; Seth at 205; Enosh at 190; and so on), and reckons "the years from ADAM to the FLOOD… two thousand, and two hundred, and forty and two" after Josephus — i.e. he simply uses the Greek chronology the Fathers preferred, and records the divergent Hebrew/Syriac totals "in historical fashion" as alternative reckonings.

The divergences are a matter of which version he followed — the explaining note is his editor's, not a charge

"A GENERAL WARNING by BEDJAN. Various statements will be found in this HISTORY which do not agree with the Book of the Law of the Syrians which is called 'peshitta'… It is not seemly for us to stumble over these because our author made use of the Book of the Law according to the Seventy (i.e. the Septuagint), and the Book of the Law according to the SAMARITANS, and other ancient [versions of the] Scriptures, and he wrote down in historical fashion the opinion of each one of them even as he found it."

note by the editor Paul Bedjan, in Budge's Chronography (1932), source.2 This is the closest thing in the Chronography to an explanation of why the numbers differ — and it is not Bar Hebraeus's, but his nineteenth-century editor's, and it names the cause as the author's free use of several text-traditions, expressly not Jewish corruption. Bar Hebraeus's own textual awareness is of the same neutral cast: at the disputed "second Kainan" he notes only that "EUSEBIUS doth not reckon this KAINAN… neither doth the Hebrew Book… and our Syrian Book doth not. But LUKE… mentioneth him in the Gospel" — a flat collation of who has the name and who lacks it, with no suggestion that anyone cut it out.

Notes

Sources


  1. Bar Hebraeus, The Chronography, trans. E. A. Wallis Budge (Oxford, 1932), "The Patriarchs. From Adam to Moses" (c. 1286): "And from ADAM to the death of MOSES is three thousand eight hundred (or, four hundred) and fifty years, according to ANIANUS the monk… According to the Septuagint, however, it is three thousand eight hundred (or, four hundred) and eighty-two years, and according the Syrian and Hebrew [Books] it is two thousand four hundred and twenty [years]." The begetting-ages are given in their longer Septuagint form (Adam begets Seth at 230, Seth at 205, Enosh at 190…), and Adam-to-Flood is reckoned "two thousand, and two hundred, and forty and two" after Josephus. 

  2. Paul Bedjan's editorial note in Budge, The Chronography (1932): "A GENERAL WARNING by BEDJAN. Various statements will be found in this HISTORY which do not agree with the Book of the Law of the Syrians which is called 'peshitta'… because our author made use of the Book of the Law according to the Seventy (i.e. the Septuagint), and the Book of the Law according to the SAMARITANS, and other ancient [versions of the] Scriptures, and he wrote down in historical fashion the opinion of each one of them even as he found it." On the "second Kainan," Bar Hebraeus notes only: "Now EUSEBIUS doth not reckon this KAINAN and his years…; neither doth the Hebrew Book…, and our Syrian Book doth not. But LUKE… mentioneth him in the Gospel." 

  3. The modern listing: Henry B. Smith Jr., "The Case for the Septuagint's Chronology in Genesis 5 and 11" (ICC 2018), p. 122: "Julian of Toledo…, Jacob of Edessa…, Byzantine chronologist George Syncellus…, and Armenian annalist Bar Hebraeus… also made this claim (Smith Jr. 2017, p. 171, n. 14)" — with no quotation from Bar Hebraeus. The "1375 years less" line is from Bar Hebraeus's Historia Compendiosa Dynastiarum, via Edward Pococke's 1663 Latin and Gustav Seyffarth, as Smith adduces it against critics: "According to the Hebrew Testament there elapsed between the creation and Christ 1375 years less than according to the Septuagint" — a statement of numeric difference, not of deliberate alteration.