HistoricalChristian.Faith

Hippolytus of Rome on prayer to the saints

Dates: c. 204 (the Commentary on Daniel; Hippolytus c. 170–235) · Wikipedia
Summary: In the oldest surviving Christian commentary on a book of Scripture, Hippolytus breaks off his exposition of Daniel 3 to turn and address the three youths of the fiery furnace directly: "remember me, I entreat you, that I also may obtain the same lot of martyrdom with you." This is genuine second-person address carrying a petition — not merely a statement that the three intercede — which is why the continuity side of the dating debate adduces it as an early instance of invocation. But it sits inside an extended homiletic apostrophe (the same breath asks the youths to "describe to us" the form of the fourth man in the furnace), so whether it attests invocation as a settled devotional act, or is a preacher's rhetorical turn to figures of Scripture, is precisely the question it raises.

The passage

Hippolytus is expounding the canticle the three sing in the furnace (the Song of the Three Children, inserted at Daniel 3:24–90 in the Greek of Theodotion). Having walked through their enumeration of all creation, he quotes their closing self-naming — "Bless the Lord, Ananiah, Azariah, and Misahl … because he took us from Hades and saved us from the hand of death" — and then, at the head of the next section, turns from third-person exposition to address the three themselves:

Tell me, you three boys, remember me, I entreat you, that I also may obtain the same lot of martyrdom with you, who was the fourth person with you who was walking in the midst of the furnace and who was hymning to God with you as from one mouth? Describe to us his form and beauty so that we also, seeing him in the flesh, may recognize him. Who was he who in this way orderly described all creation through your mouth, so that you omitted nothing of which is and has been?

— Commentary on Daniel 2.30.1–2, in T. C. Schmidt's translation. The address continues in the same key, telling the youths that "the Word was with you and was speaking through you," before Hippolytus returns to third-person commentary.¹ The petition proper is the clause remember me, I entreat you, that I also may obtain the same lot of martyrdom with you: Hippolytus asks the three to keep him in mind so that he too may be granted martyrdom — a request addressed to them, in the second person, in the optative of his own desire.

The setting: a martyr's commentary under persecution

The Commentary on Daniel is the earliest surviving running commentary on a book of the Bible by a Christian author, composed c. 202–211 (conventionally c. 204) while the Roman church suffered under the persecution of Septimius Severus. Hippolytus — a presbyter and the most learned theologian of the early-third-century Roman church, himself later reckoned a martyr — wrote to steady a frightened congregation, holding up Daniel, Susanna, and above all the three youths as models of those who do not flinch before the fire. He casts the three as proto-martyrs and "athletes" contending against the state, and earlier in the work has them "about to be crowned" with the victor's wreath.² The apostrophe at 2.30 is the emotional peak of that exhortation: a man who longs for martyrdom turning to the furnace's survivors and asking to share their lot. (His wish, by the tradition, was granted — Hippolytus died in exile on Sardinia c. 235.) Read in context, the address is an act of homiletic pathos woven into a pastoral argument, not a rubric drawn from a liturgy.³

Invocation, or rhetorical apostrophe?

The passage is adduced on both sides of this doctrine's central question, and the honest reading grants something to each.

What tells for invocation. Grammatically this is second-person petition, not a third-person report. Hippolytus does not say "the three youths pray for the church"; he says remember me, I entreat you — addressing the holy dead and asking them to do something on his behalf. That is the same form as the later catacomb petitions (in mente habete nos, "keep us in mind") and the Sub Tuum Praesidium, and it crosses the line the whole debate turns on: it is invocation, not mere intercession-belief. By the calendar it is early — c. 204, a half-century before the catacomb graffiti and nearly two centuries before the Cappadocian homilies — so it shows the act of addressing a departed saint is not a fourth-century invention.

What tells against pressing it. The petition is embedded in an unmistakable rhetorical apostrophe: in the same sentence Hippolytus asks the three to "describe to us" the appearance of the fourth man in the furnace and to say "who was he who … described all creation through your mouth" — questions he plainly does not expect them to answer, addressed for the congregation's benefit, not the youths'. Apostrophe — the orator's turn to address an absent or dead person, a thing, or an abstraction — was a standard figure of ancient preaching, and a commentator who apostrophises Scripture's heroes is doing something a homilist might do without any cult of invocation behind it. The address is also a one-off: it is a flourish at the climax of a martyrdom-exhortation, not part of a repeated devotional practice, a liturgical formula, or a shrine-cult. And its object is a pair (in fact a trio) of Old Testament figures, not the Christian martyrs around whom the later cult of saints actually formed. So the clause has the form of invocation while its setting is rhetorical, and it cannot by itself carry the weight of a settled invocational practice c. 204.

The fair conclusion is that Hippolytus supplies a real and genuinely early data-point — the act of directly petitioning the holy dead is attested, in the second person, at the start of the third century — but a modest one, whose homiletic frame keeps it short of proof that invocation was already a fixed devotion. How much it weighs is adjudicated, against the rest of the evidence, in the development-vs-apostolicity question, where it figures on the continuity side; both Hippolytus's own overstating proponents and the dating argument's treatment turn on not confusing the petition's form with its setting.⁴

A note on the canticle

A separate fragment of Hippolytus, "On the Song of the Three Children," opens with the line "O Ananias, Azarias, and Misael, bless ye the Lord; O ye apostles, prophets, and martyrs of the Lord, bless ye the Lord." That looks like a second address to the youths, but it is in fact Hippolytus echoing and expanding the canticle itself — the Benedicite, in which the three call on every order of creation, and finally on themselves, to bless God (Daniel 3:88 / Song 65: "O Ananias, Azarias, and Misael, bless ye the Lord"). It is the youths' own self-exhortation to praise, glossed with the church's orders of saints, not Hippolytus petitioning them. The genuine invocation-shaped passage is the apostrophe at 2.30, not this canticle-quotation — a distinction worth keeping, since the two are easily run together.⁵

Notes

• This witness bears on two arguments in this doctrine's Arguments section. It is an early instance on the invocation side of the invocation / intercession-belief distinction (a second-person petition, not a statement that the saints pray for us), and it is a continuity-side data-point in the development-vs-apostolicity question, where its early date weighs for continuity but its homiletic-apostrophe setting limits how much it can prove.
• The closest companions on the timeline are the third-century catacomb petitions to Peter and Paul — which share the "remember us"/"keep us in mind" form but are a relic-shrine cult of the apostle-martyrs — and the disputed Sub Tuum Praesidium, the earliest petitionary prayer to Mary.

Sources