HistoricalChristian.Faith

Amphilochius of Iconium on the Old Testament Canon

Dates: c. 380 AD (the canon catalogue is the verse epistle Iambics for Seleucus [Iambi ad Seleucus], composed for a young man named Seleucus; Amphilochius c. 340–403, bishop of Iconium in Lycaonia and friend of the Cappadocians) · Wikipedia
Verdict on the deuterocanon: NO — a Hebrew-sized Old Testament. Amphilochius versifies the canon book by book for his pupil, and the disputed Greek books are simply not there: no Tobit, no Judith, no Wisdom of Solomon, no Sirach, no Maccabees — and even Esther is admitted only with a reservation, "with these, some approve the inclusion of Esther." He opens by warning that "not every book is safe which has acquired the venerable name of Scripture," sorting the genuinely "divinely inspired books" from the pseudonymous and spurious. He stands with his fellow Cappadocians Gregory of Nazianzus and Basil as an Eastern Hebrew-canon witness, of a piece with Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius, and Epiphanius.

Claims & evidence

"Not every book is safe which has acquired the venerable name of Scripture"

Writing to instruct Seleucus, Amphilochius frames the whole list as an exercise in discernment: the catalogue exists precisely to separate the inspired Scriptures from forgeries that wear the name. He reaches the Old Testament after this warning and recites it book by book:¹

But this especially for you to learn is fitting: not every book is safe which has acquired the venerable name of Scripture. For there appear from time to time pseudonymous books, some of which are intermediate or neighbours, as one might say, to the words of Truth, while others are spurious and utterly unsafe, like counterfeit and spurious coins which bear the king's inscription, but as regards their material are base forgeries. For this reason I will state for you the divinely inspired books one by one, so that you may learn them clearly. I will first recite those of the Old Testament. The Pentateuch has Creation, then Exodus, and Leviticus, the middle book, after which is Numbers, then Deuteronomy. Add to these Joshua, and Judges, then Ruth, and of Kingdoms the four books, and the double team of Chronicles; after these, Esdras, one and then the second. Then I would review for you five in verse: Job, crowned in the contests of many sufferings, and the Book of Psalms, soothing remedy for the soul, three of Solomon the Wise: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Canticle of Canticles. Add to these the Prophets Twelve… After these prophets learn yet another four: The great and fearless Isaiah, the sympathetic Jeremiah, and mysterious Ezekiel, and finally Daniel, most wise in his deeds and words. With these, some approve the inclusion of Esther.

The deuterocanon is absent

Counted out against the disputed books, the verdict is plain: the Pentateuch; Joshua, Judges, Ruth; the four books of Kingdoms (1–2 Samuel, 1–2 Kings) and two of Chronicles; the two of Esdras (Ezra–Nehemiah); the poetic five (Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs); the Twelve Minor Prophets; and the four major prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel). No Tobit, no Judith, no Wisdom of Solomon, no Sirach, no Maccabees — the very Greek books a Septuagint-sized canon would carry. This is the protocanonical Hebrew list, the same boundary Cyril and Athanasius draw on this timeline, and unlike Cyril's Jeremiah it is not even softened by a folded-in Baruch or Epistle of Jeremiah — Amphilochius names Jeremiah alone.¹

Esther only "some approve"

Amphilochius is more guarded even than his Hebrew-canon neighbours on one protocanonical book. He does not list Esther outright; he appends it as a book whose place is contested — "with these, some approve the inclusion of Esther."¹ That hesitation mirrors the doubts Athanasius and the Eastern lists record about Esther, and it sharpens the point: a Father this cautious about admitting Esther plainly had no room for Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, or Maccabees, which he does not so much as mention.

Notes

• A teaching poem, not a council decree. The Iambics for Seleucus is a catechetical verse letter addressed to one student, fixing the books "one by one, so that you may learn them clearly." Like Cyril's baptismal catechesis and Gregory of Nazianzus's own canon poem, Amphilochius sets the boundary by what is taught and read as inspired, not by conciliar legislation — the characteristic fourth-century Eastern mode.
• The Cappadocian cluster. Amphilochius was a cousin of Gregory of Nazianzus and a close associate of Basil of Caesarea, who consecrated him bishop of Iconium and addressed several letters and a major treatise to him. His Hebrew-sized list belongs with Gregory of Nazianzus's near-identical canon poem, the two forming a tight Cappadocian testimony to the shorter Old Testament alongside Cyril and the Egyptian witness of Athanasius.
• Cleaner than Cyril on Jeremiah. Where Cyril reckons Jeremiah "including Baruch… and the Epistle," carrying two deuterocanonical works inside a canonical book, Amphilochius lists Jeremiah without any such appendix. On the face of his poem his Old Testament is the bare Hebrew canon, with not even a bundled exception — only the open question over Esther.
• The opening warning cuts both ways. His coin metaphor — books that "bear the king's inscription, but as regards their material are base forgeries" — is aimed chiefly at the New Testament, where he goes on to flag disputed and rejected books. But it governs the Old Testament list too: the catalogue's whole purpose is to mark off the "divinely inspired books" from those merely "neighbours… to the words of Truth," and the deuterocanon falls outside the line he draws.

Sources