1 Thessalonians 3:5

"For this cause I also, when I could no longer forbear, sent that I might know your faith, lest by any means the tempter had tempted you, and our labor should be in vain."

A Question lies before us to-day, which is much disputed, and which is gathered from many sources. But what is this question? "For this cause," he says, "when I could no longer forbear, I sent Timothy that I might know your faith." What sayest thou? He, who knew so many things, who heard unutterable words, who ascended even to the third heaven, doth not he know, even when he is in Athens? And yet the distance is not great, nor has he been long parted from them. For he says, "Being bereaved of you for a short season." He does not know the affairs of the Thessalonians, but is compelled to send Timothy to know their faith, "lest," he says, "the tempter had tempted you, and our labors should be in vain."

What then is one to say? That the Saints knew not all things. And this one might learn from many instances, both of the early ones, and of those who came after them. And this comes to pass out of great care on God's part. How, and in what way? For the sake both of the Saints themselves, and of those who believe in them. For as He permits that there should be persecutions, so He permits that they should also be ignorant of many things, that they may be kept humble.

What means, "Lest by any means the tempter had tempted you"? Dost thou see that to be shaken in afflictions proceeds from the devil, and from his seduction? For when he cannot shake us ourselves, he takes another way, and shakes the weaker sort through our means.

"And our labor," he says, "should be in vain." Wherefore! for even if they were turned aside, it was not through thy fault, not through thy negligence. But nevertheless, though this were the case, I think, from my great love of the brethren, that my labor had been rendered vain.

"Lest by any means the tempter had tempted you." But he tempts, not knowing whether he shall overthrow. Does he then, even though he knows not, yet assail us, and do we, who know that we shall completely overcome him, not watch? Let us all hear, how Paul labored. He does not say work, but "labor"; he does not say, and you be lost, but "our labor." So that even if anything had happened, it would be happening with some reason. But that it did not happen was a great wonder. These things indeed we expected, he says, but the contrary happened. For not only did we receive from you no addition to our affliction but even consolation.

O Paul! If you predicted to them that you would endure affliction, and that they should not be troubled by this affliction, then why do you send again? It turns out that you do not yet fully trust them. Out of great love, he says, I do this. For those who love are anxious even about what is safe. At the same time, the temptations were many, and the excessive multitude of calamities frightened me. Therefore he did not say: having noticed something in you, I sent, but "being unable to bear it any longer," which comes from love.

Here some ask: why did he who was caught up to the third heaven, who heard inexpressible words (2 Cor. 12:6), not know what was happening with the Thessalonians, but sent Timothy "to learn about their faith"? One may say that not everything was known even by the saints who lived before Christ and after Christ. For Elisha too did not know about the Shunammite woman (2 Kings 4:8). And Elijah thought that he alone was left, while there were still seven thousand others (1 Kings 19:10). And before them, Samuel receives instruction not to pay attention to the appearance of David's eldest brother (1 Sam. 16:7). So the apostles too did not know everything. And this was by the special providence of God, so that neither would they themselves become proud, nor would others think too highly of them, and so that later Christians could not say that they performed feats of virtue because they were above ordinary men, and therefore give themselves over to negligence; but rather, so that we would know that even they did not always rely on the help of God, but accomplished their feats through their own labors.

I, he says, did not suppose that you were shaken, except perhaps because you were subjected to temptations. Do you see that disturbance in afflictions is the work of the devil, and especially when some are scandalized as a result of others experiencing misfortune? So he acted with Job, troubling his wife by the fact that he was suffering. However, the devil tempts without knowing whether he will prevail, as is evident from the example of Job; yet, being shameless, he attacks, and if he sees any weakness, he remains and waits; but if he sees strength, he retreats.

If they had gone astray, O Paul, what is that to you? Your labor will not remain without full reward from God. However, he says, on account of my strong love, I would have considered my labor lost.

For this reason, when I could bear it no longer, I sent that I might know your faith, how firm you are in your faith: "Know well the condition of your flocks, and give attention to your herds" (Prov. 27:23); for fear that somehow the tempter had tempted you, that is, the devil: "And the tempter came" (Matt. 4:3). There is a commentary which says: "Whose business it is to tempt."

But on the contrary, both the world and the flesh also tempt, as is said in James (1:14): "Each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire." Also in Genesis (22:1): "God tested Abraham." It is necessary to point out that "to tempt" means to make a test of something. And in this matter the purpose must be considered for which one wants to test something, and in what manner one wants to test something. For this occurs in two ways: either so that the person testing may know about it, or so that he may make it known to another. God does not need to tempt in the first way, for He knows what is in man as is stated in John 2. Rather in the second way: for God tempted Abraham so that others might know of his faith. A temptation in the first manner may occur in two ways, that is, it leads towards some good, as when the bishop examines those to be promoted; or else, somebody tempts in order to deceive, and this is the work of the devil; for the devil tests the condition of men in order that he may lead them to the various sins to which they are prone in accordance with their various dispositions: "Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking some one to devour" (1 Pet. 5:8). Therefore, it is the devil's business to tempt in order to deceive. The world and the flesh are said to tempt in a material way, for through them and the things to which they lead a knowledge is achieved about man as to whether he is really steadfast in God's commandments and in the love of God. Because if concupiscence triumphs, the person does not love God in a perfect manner, nor does he love in a perfect manner when the concerns of the world either frighten him or exert an undue influence upon him.

And that our labor would be in vain, because if you do not resist temptation our labor would be in vain: "I am afraid I have labored over you in vain" (Gal. 4:11). "None of the righteous deeds which he has done shall be remembered" (Ez. 18:24). The labor is regarded as "in vain" with respect to an eternal reward; nevertheless the good deeds performed prior to sin profit a person, for they shall live again after repentance, and also because they readily dispose one towards conversion.